That ^^^^^^^
That’s all we ask
My Great uncle was one of the British soldiers that fought the Japanese out there so I appreciate the noting of their presence
1 Like
i mainly play air, I have US, RU, israel, japan, to top tier. my sweden is also rank 5 or something, im also trying to grind china. frankly i couldnt care less where singapore goes. in fact israel makes the most sense to me
My great Grandad fought in Burma again the Japanese and was captured thankfully he made it out alive.
If a Canadian sub tree comes, it should either be in a united commonwealth TT with Australia, South Africa and India, or it should be a British sub tree.
I don’t really think either of those sub trees are needed, but if there are unique vehicles that don’t have another home, that’s where they should go.
1 Like
Germany could do with a subtree for air, but Russia, like the US doesn’t need a subtree at all, they barely have enough room for their own vehicles, and any reasonable subtree would just be more US vehicles for the US and Russian vehicles for Russia
@Smin1080p_WT Can we expect more vehicles in this update or the cn squadron and the Italian tornado are the last ones?
idk
PL-8B has a better motor for more speed and range yet it is not modeled in
As for Python 4 it’s gaijin’s inconsistency.
1 Like
Nah I hate the hypocrisy of it. US/DE/RU players can claim whatever. Just they can’t say that Britain is claiming the world when they also claim Aus/Can/Ost/Pol/Ukr.
they cant, but I can, since i dont main them. AGAIN its like i have to repeat this, I DO NOT condone or agree when they claim whatever whatever or the whole world. BY the extension of that logic, I also do not condone/agree for uk to claim whatever whatever nation/ whole world. its literally just on the same line of logic here
Us doesn’t need a sub
neither does UK, and no im not speaking as a us/ger/ru main
I’m not saying they can’t have these things. I’m saying don’t say “Britain can’t have Canada they’re claiming the world” and then say “Canada should come to Germany/America” in the same breath
and im not saying can should come to germany/ america
infact I AM GOING TO SAY: germany and america dont need CANADA/AUS
frankly this feels kinda like strawmen argument
1 Like
There’s a few botes and a new Harrier in the files, so they might make it in
Lemme guess another top tier harrier?
T.10, so no, it’s a worse GR.7 at best I think
Well I don’t main Britain but you still keep calling me a main and supporter
2 Likes
I mean, if Germany doesn’t need Austria and/or Switzerland and the USSR doesn’t need eastern bloc nations, then Britain definitely doesn’t need any more subtrees either
I wonder if the (possible) inclusion of T.10 also means we can get other traine variant of the other aircraft? Please be MIG-29KUB at some point
3 Likes
you dont have to main x nation to act like and talk like x nation main/supporter. news at 11
again, i told you before, one can play 1 nation and still talk better than a one nation main.
and then there is the reverse of that, one can play 10 nations and still only argue/talk for/ solely support that one nation that he has bias for
More trainer aircraft the better.
1 Like
I would rather see dedicated trainer aircraft than trainer versions of regular fighters tbh, but all trainers are welcome
Lets put this argument to bed shall we?
4 Likes