Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

They were first used to bomb damascus so ofc its exported lol

2 Likes

RADAR BUG FIX IS AMAZING. Thank you snail.

Shouldn’t all hornet variants be able to carry Walleye I and II?
Can someone bug report this if thats the case IRL?

Of course XD

Please read what I said correctly.

The T-80BVM and T-90M have already received updated modules. I’m not comparing apples to oranges here.

1 Like

Why did the vehicle structure refinement only update M1 and Leopard 2, and the refinement of other countries?

1 Like

Id like the A to get them too, but early C is a good start

And you have some knowledge why they aren’t getting turret baskets in the future?

Also part of the dm update has been beneficial for the Abrams as its breech is a lot better. There is no bias here.

I’m easy on the A, but I get the sentiment, the 9M over the 9L is usually just a 0.3 BR increase, but it feels so much better to use

Yeah, and 9L really isn’t a gulf war loadout lol

Vt-5 is is in the files , the stars have aligned

1 Like

P1 Osorio with 105 L7 should go to Brits tree.
P2 Osorio with 120mm Giat …well … can go to France? If not, then British is still the 2nd choice.

other Brazilian stuffs which are mostly based on modified US platforms can go to the US

1 Like

I mean that famous MiG-21 shootdown was with a 9M and a 7M, surely that would be the loadout to go for.

Not that I’m upset about the AIM-7P but it’s a very minor upgrade realistically

1 Like

Personally, F/A-18C late (Iraqi Freedom era) armed AGM-65E (80’s)

But I want AGM-65E & AGM-65F to replace AGM-65D & AGM-65G on AV-8B+ (USMC) and AGM-65E & AGM-65G on AV-8B Night Attack in dev server

This ?

Now F/A-18C Early only received AGM-84E SLAM

so the export variant specifically, not the PLA ZTQ-15? Strange.
and still no ZTZ-96B?

1 Like

Am I speaking a foreign language? I don’t understand what’s so difficult to follow here.

M1’s/Leo 2’s get trunnions/baskets which are counted as traverse mechanisms due to their ‘‘updated modules’’, yet the T-80BVM and T-90M with their own recently updated modules have none of these parts modelled.

The Challenger 2 is irrelevant as that has not yet received upgraded modules as far as I’m aware.

Please don’t lie.

There is no change in protection to the breech area of the M1’s, in fact, it’s now counted as a vertical drive mechanism as well so that’s a nerf, plain and simple.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/q4numP2dL20K

And that’s not even mentioning the fact that this would’ve been a good opportunity to actually fix the mantlet armour as well as a myriad of modelling issues, but Gaijin went the lazy route and fixed absolutely nothing.

2 Likes

What did they fix?

1 Like

They’re everywhere lol, although major operatora include sweden, italy and Israel.

Also saw an image of an F-16I with stormbreakers, which would be nice considering you can run half Spice 250ER and half GBU-53