Yeah… Im just hoping for some decent bug fixes.
No spall cone and amount of fragments still not correct…
Someone said earlier that the new hidden leak on Gszabi 's website looks like the Thai aircraft designation system, ex. B. Kh. 19 ( F-16A )
Only seven letters ahead of the designator code though. Doesn’t really fit " Falcon " or " Gripen " or " Golden Eagle ", so it might be a prop plane instead of something currently in service. Like " Bearcat " [B.Kh.15]
3 Likes
oof
See i was hoping for more low BR Thai stuff. Huge win if it is imo
4 Likes
Like 40 % from true efficiency
You can keep saying the 15J(M) is 14.0 but saying it doesn’t make it one. It’s a 13.7 aircraft in the current game. That doesn’t mean it’s bad, but clearly it lacks things that put it to 14.0.
4 Likes
Don’t be a bad sport, it’s not the video creators’ “fault”.
1 Like
What was the projected designation for the thai f18
nope, those are AIM-260 mate.
B.Kh.20, which was taken up by the Gripen afterwards.
Then the F-15E also lacks those things due to being an F-104S to the F-4E, in this case the F-15JM is the F-4E and the F-15E is the F-104S in the comparison.
Unless someone wants to convince me that the F-104S is somehow better than the F-4E just cause it’s faster.
I remain unconvinced that just because something is made faster while trading energy retention and keeping all else equal requires a separate BR.
Lmao
2 Likes
Off topic, but can I still hold onto hope for the J-11B?
Sorry if it’s already confirmed but I’m not reading 1500+ posts to find out.
2 Likes
And I thought I could make crazy theory posts.
Those aren’t even in service yet. What are you on about?
Omg
F-15E without CFTs has better flight performance to the F-15C/J(M). That alone can pull it up to 14.0.
I know in the past you’ve said the F-15E’s new engines don’t make a difference but, that’s clearly not true in BVR combat.
2 Likes