wtf is this
Yak-38U Forger-B, two-seat trainer version of the Yak-38
Like I said, naval fighter line between the Sea Harrier FA.2 and the F-35B.
There is a gap there and it can be filled by our subtree.
I dont even know how should I comment on that
Too bad for you, i don’t want the interest of a whole country grind to be stopped to save one line in another TT.
A hole in ONE line is not a gap.
A gap is “nothing around x BRs for the TT” Not one thing lacking at a place in the TT, like France ~ 10.3 ground for example, this is a gap.
2 Likes
This is what happens when the whiney brits and whiney french turn on each other lolllll
A BR 1.3 - 1.7 gap is not much of a gap, and irrelevant cause guess what? Typhoon exists.
Gaps of individual lines don’t matter as much as general BR gaps.
1 Like
You’re now claiming that the only reason people play the French tree is the Rafale M? That is a pretty bold claim.
And again, I’ve never suggested that other gaps shouldn’t be filled where possible, what would you suggest that could fill that ~10.3 ground gap for France? I don’t know much about ground so you’ll have to help me out here
is J-11B😭
According to the evaluation of J10A test pilots, we can conclude that J10 did receive some influence from Lavi (advanced fighter design methods such as computer design, analysis, and simulation). However, it is absolutely wrong to say that J10 copied Lavi. Lavi was mainly designed by the United States rather than Israel, but it is impossible to say that Lavi had no impact on J10. There is no plagiarism or theft. Just following the trend of the times.
总结
2 Likes
I do’nt want to bring the talk to possible 10.3 ground, i was showing you WHAT a real gap is.
Both Rafale and EFT are on the same BR, that’s mean you d’ont have gap here, since you lready have vehicles.
2 Likes
Ok sure, but you’re using the argument of “my suffering is greater, so yours is irrelevant” which is a terrible bad faith argument
I’m not against gaps in the French tree being filled, in fact I’m in favour of it, but the two arguments aren’t connected in any way
1 Like
How UK TT suffer a gap when you have the same number of vehicles than France at that rank ?
Where is that gap that need you to get our uniquess vehicles?
Anyway it’s wall talking i’m stopping here.
But thoses would exist as long Smin or other don’t put words on that case.
*There is a gap that could have been filled if the members of the eurofighter program had made the carrier version of the eurofighter like the competing program
Hi guys, has anyone lags in game too after fixes?
1 Like
As I always say on these joint projects. Blame the Germans, its prob their fault xD
2 Likes
they can remain happy. If america has to live with everyone getting their F16s, F15 and F18s, then Russia can live with the UK (minor nation btw) getting the MiG29K and SU-30MKI!!!
Really hope one of these comes this update haha
1 Like
The story of this topic unfortunately
8 Likes
Again, India is a subtree, what is the point of a subtree if not to fill in gaps?
I’m not the biggest fan of having India as a subtree, and I don’t particularly want the Rafale, but it’s here so might as well put it to work
1 Like
Harrier GR.9, MiG29K. Rafale if the indians ever fix their carrier problem. F35B is the end goal
1 Like
remembers when sub trees were unique vehicles like ratels xD
1 Like