it’s unfortunate that bombers have to suffer that on top of their current state gameplay-wise, but I also kinda understand that it would be a lot of dev work to go back and model all of that
yea I know thats why im ignoring him now
3 Likes
You have one on your H-34 and ingame it is SACLOS for whatever reason
Hmmm, I see. I’m surprised we don’t have the AMX-13-105 yet tbh. I thought we’ve exhausted all the oscillating turrets by now, but I think we have even one more medium tank turret left
sounds like you have no counterargument
They should add SACLOS bullpup to jets too, if it’s real
they did iirc
Same gap in the naval fighter line between the Sea Harrier and the F-35.
I see two reasonable options to fill it personally:
either we get the MiG-29K and the Rafale M from the Indian navy
or we get some combination of CF-188, F/A-18A, and F/A-18F
now the second option requires bending some rules, but the upside is that the “damage” is limited to effectively one US jet in multiple variants, as opposed to a French and a Russian jet
2 Likes
teaser today?
Aren’t they all manual guided in-game though?
another ragebait comment no way
1 Like
Super hornet and hornet are basically 2 different jets
Bullpups were TV guided ingame for a while, but I am pretty sure there never were variants of the Bullpup that actually were SACLOS or TV guided
1 Like
all right marines grab the Sherman (yes I know its french just seems slike something the marines would) do
The germans had an amphibious t-34-85 attempt btw
it’s a naval jet, not necessarily a Navy jet, but definitely a naval jet, I mean it was built in the US, and we operate it from our aircraft carriers, it’s hard to argue it’s not a US naval jet.
you should play the mig21pfm with the kh66 and then get back to me on this
Funny part is all the boat can be operated from inside the Sherman.
So honestly it could be pretty tanky as a boat, and deal good damage, as long Gaijin don’t put it at 7.0…
Not even naval can escape the Sherman copypasta
6 Likes