It’s not that bad lol
5 Likes
Its not like gaijin gives any abrams hull armor tho
Just remember this the next time someone complains about cut-and-paste vehicles. Sometimes the company does it to be cheap, sure. But most of the time they do it just to avoid all the playerbase whining if they don’t do it.
2 Likes
You guys think we ever see the S-37 even though it was a mere concept proposal? Single engine delta canard flanker.
And worse hull armour
Yep no DU for the abrams :(
1 Like
No, it’s the same case as the EAP/ACA/TKF-90
From 1977, way after the French oscillating turret.
Kugelblitz
From 1945 afaik.
France in 1939 made the Panhard 201
2 Likes
thats the thing that bother me, there are info from DTIC that say all abrams hull (except AIM and SEP+) are the same, but some other states the latter HA/HC/A2 has better hull than the previous
I know that thing, can be a very good thing in game, combing MIG-27K and SU-27/MIG-29, but sadly it’s just a paper plane so no
It’s not a paper plane, it’s a tech demonstrator
it only model stage, no actually plane ever made I think
This
3 Likes
Bruh, what’s the point of designations if they just reuse them
Hmmm France
4 Likes
What was that?
It’s really a bad ass.
The Gaijin folding will cause a new epidemic
1 Like
It’s not a bad example.
Both the plane and the tank get improvements that change the way they perform and are played drastically in their own ways.
Not to mention that SEPv3 could receive M829A3 or M829A4 as well on top of the armor improvements. (Honestly, SEPv2 should have M829A3 and SEPv3 should have M829A4, their main service shells.)
I’ll go further- ground vehicle additions also play a role in lineup building; a factor that is not existent in air battles.
1 Like