Gaijin’s current rule for Naval is that they can add any vessel which was laid down.
I believe one of the H designs was in fact laid down, H-39, the sixteen-inch version of Bismarck. So yeah that’s possible.
Russia also has another class of designed battlecruisers that were laid down beyond Kronshtadt.
Soyuz was not laid down
also magic 2 maybe
@Morvran decided to play the F-5A(G)-40 and i can confirm even with broken fingers its still insanely good (until the CM nerf with the next update lol) Penguin is good at making players think someone is climbing, baited a Mig 23ML into trying to climb and R24R my Penguin lmao. Colt MK.12 say hallo, definitely a good vehicle and a contender for the best 11.0 on sweden…huh thats pretty sad oh well
If we go paper vehicles route then we can expect to see USS Montana and HMS Lion
Neither was montana
I doubt we will be getting those anytime soon hahahah
I mean, we got literal Eurofighters capped with 9Ms that were never mounted on them instead of 9Xs or IRIS-Ts, so I can already imagine stuff like even F-22 still capped to 9Ms as well.
Not really, A-10C, AV-8B+, F-15E, F-16C all have better pods available to them
I do believe Uss montana was laid down and converted to uss mid way
Isn’t the F-22 literally physically incapable of carrying 9M due to the internal mounting?
It was:
can carry 9M
No, nuclear shells were real, so should be available to Iowa class
Oh well, see u next week guys, have a good weekend and dont cause riot.
You can use colors to mark things confirmed by Gaijin.
Like this:
Completion of 2024 Roadmap features, confirmed in Covert Disclosures, includes item recycling, CMCD5
[color=#22aaaa]Completion of 2024 Roadmap features, confirmed in Covert Disclosures, includes item recycling, CMCD5[/color]
Just surround what you want with color tags. Don’t use red though. That’s against forum rules.
The ww2 montana class was never laid down unfortunately
Not if the pods aren’t added lol and I am pretty sure not even Sniper would get close to the current Gen 3 resolution ingame
It was the only IR misisle it could carry until 201- something when they put 9X on it
china should recive the PL-8B at the same time israel recives the Python-4, for the ones who dont know the PL-8B also uses a 4 element seeker like the PL-9, PL-5E-II, TY-90, Magic-2. in the Python-4 and AAM-3 case both are still using the good old 2 element seeker from the 80s i mean its not bad but its not the newest technology either, in terms of IRCCM technology the PL-8B, PL-5E-II, TY-90, PL-9 even the Magic-2 are more advanced but we know that gaijin likes to implements IR missiles in a way that is more family friendly to us… soo… we could see them soon and like smin said we should not expect “Any MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS any time soon” but this does not mean that we couldn´t see some of the last 4Gen IR missiles between of what we have now and what its going to come in the future it seems really logic to add the last batch of 4 gen IRs now in march or in may/june before we goes full 5gen IIR in december or much likely next year.
PS: PL-8B is fully produced in china with chinese components and technology, also the engine was upgraded too increasing its range to 20-25km soo… it doesn´t keep the single stage solid propellant engine from the old Python-3, and also features the PL-9 style all-aspect InSb seeker and a programmable digital processor, which offers a wider off-boresight angle. its a really cool missiles and a really improved one because the only thing it keeps from the old Python-3 is the body haha.
SNIPER-XR maybe?