9M has poor short range performance
Uptiers
What IR missile has longer range than the 9M except for R-27T/ET?
None im just mentioning its drawbacks
So what?
In close dogfights people will be slinging R-73s and MICAs from hilarious angles while your pre-led 9Ms will be unable to even head in their direction.
I mean pretty much every nations besides Russia still has BBs to add.
Iowa, Yamato, Bismarck, Littorio, King George V, Vanguard, North Carolina, Richelieu, and more
I’m not saying the f-18 will go at 14.0 but that it could still have a chance when it gets dragged up there from whatever br it’s at.
Russia still has Sovietsky Soyuz
Sure, each missiles have their advantages/disadvantages but I disagree with the characterization that the AIM-9M is the worst missile in top tier.
There situational missiles cant wait for aim 9x 60G fun time
Denmark mentioned lets goooo
Stilk adding paper vehicles
I think we just need to apply the SB bracket system to RB
Does this man we can add 16inch or 20 inch
bismarck when yamatos added
Context is important. I’d much rather have magic II or R-73 on the typhoon in a dogfight, but would rather have Aim-9M to ambush people. Though 9Ms need their IRL lock ranges
AAM-3 R-24T R-23T some french radar missiles with IR seeker
PL-5 series, Python 3/PL-8
If they get 16" Bismarck we get nuke iowa
No you get montana
I dont think I’ve ever heard anyone claim that TIALD was “all that great”
If they were to rework resolutions to be more realistic you would sit at resolutions of 640x480 at most with most pods for a while until way more modern planes arrive.