No problem with adding reliability to APCR and APDS tho…
I can see the PL-8B, but the Python 4 would be a stretch, it’s much better than the 8B for one, but also it destroys the parity between the US and Israel, and Gaijin aren’t likely to piss off the US mains to help Israel out
Thanks for the advice.
Lol no
Modifications increase repair cost no? So have it as a one that can be equipped and unequipped with a higher repair cost modifier than the rest
Many leopard variants can come, including a Leopard 2AV 120mm or Leopard 2A0. Would act as a tech tree shir 2.
Commonwealth time : P
Yes, Otomatic on Leo 1 chassis for Germany.
Yes, suggestion like that exists on RU forum.
If they get Python 4 because it was “what they have” and “their doctrine”, we should get F-22 because it’s what we have and our doctrine
I’m not sure I agree hahah. In real life, it is not to be removed, it is not a combat or operation specification.
uhm Centauro Draco? :D
Mate, repair cost is not a performance balancing factor. If they were to introduce a modification that lets you override features that are meant to keep parts of your vehicle healthy they have to model degradation for when you disable the feature.
Oh hell no
Get the Danish otomatic(eugen ltd) to the Swedes would be a more acceptable outcome
New British aircraft?
Well, if the US got the F-22 that would change things, but as of right now, the US and Israel have the same 3 top tier aircraft, with near identical performance, adding the Python 4 to Israel without giving the US something as well, it just isn’t going to happen, as much as I would love to see it
Well it could also be centauro sidam, but ofc its gonna be the draco that ppl wants
Iirc the wear induced probably wouldn’t take effect in wt match time. But the main reason was for crew safety because getting bumped around going that fast isn’t great for you even with helmets
Who did this? Why have they not been convicted for treason?