I don’t really care, do it if you want to
1 Like
AMX-10RC had a full blown 105mm cannon for a recce vehicle and you’re concerned with a puny mg turret
1 Like
Hey, I love that bomber
1 Like
BTR-60 as a silly 1.0 spaa/LT
Ah yes. “French Archer”.
That is either arty, or it’s gun folds.
4 Likes
Sure can, but I have a feeling they don’t feel like doing it.
I’m not concerned about the firepower, I am concerned about the fact that they put a needlessly tall remote MG turret on a vehicle that you ideally would want to be as small as possible
So there needs to be no reason to add EFT, Rafale, Su-30 and J-20 to US other than ppl wanting it?
1 Like
Metal pipe with wings
As i said we live in an era where because a vehicle is smaller means almost nothing for today reco tech.
Kinda looks like a giant balloon animal
1 Like
Oh yeah, I can see that
metal pipe with welded triangle flat top metal sheet mended with high rpm fans
1 Like
There’s no reason the Saudi EF couldn’t be considered, same with most of those vehicles, just not the J-20 as there isn’t another user for it
2 Likes
that was earlier concept for 1 recce vehicle to be small,
nowadays you have a light recce vehicle (based on SUV-like platforms), and larger one with myriad of sensor suites/jammers + defensive armaments
1 Like
I just don’t see what the actual benefit is. If i wanted RAF and British made jets, I’d play Britain. If I wanted MiG and Sukhois and Soviet/Russian air force stuff, I’d play USSR.
But a Saudi EFT to US or some Su-30 doesn’t fit or make sense at all, same with super hornet in UK tree.
2 Likes
We haven’t said anywhere there will or won’t be new missiles of any kind this major. However until we make an announcement, there is nothing particularly to comment on. Stay tuned.
4 Likes
Don’t look at humvee 30mm + javelin turret then lol