American 155mm ones used same M107 shell as T30 ingame afaik, so they should be pretty good.
I believe USA had 105mm HEAT/HE shells? Don’t know about AP, but it’s a possibility.
Also pretty good choices :D
American 155mm ones used same M107 shell as T30 ingame afaik, so they should be pretty good.
I believe USA had 105mm HEAT/HE shells? Don’t know about AP, but it’s a possibility.
Also pretty good choices :D
If you dont mind me asking why does an ai controlled carrier have to be worse or better?
bigger landing area and better launching on any CVN than a QE
I mean we are talking about 2 different BRs. Verdi-2 would be at 10.0-11.0 area. Ajax would be 11.3+. Ajax has alot of variants to, the standard variant wont be good in top tier without missiles. Sure some people saying its getting 2 ATGMs but not seen anything else apart from people saying it. There’s the overwatch variant which has 6 brimstones but its going to become to late eventually to add the Ajax, i mean the PUMA and and Swedish IFVs are already out there doing the job the ajax is doing.
3 203mm and a 240 lol
not sure why it would, as much as I love my QE, it’s no Nimitz
Right so designed for different purposes to handle completely different kind of aircraft, that doesn’t make anything specifically better or worse tbh, both do what they are designed for
…To be fair, given they’re casemate, probably have no gun depression, and would have a long reload+open top, they could probably be put pretty low :D
Don’t forget about the Yeramba. Which is basically a uoʇxǝS.
a CVN would be objectively better than a QE ingame, i have nothing against it its a cool carrier, but a CVN would be easier to
what about the Kondensator and Oka lol
I reiterate, why does it need to be “better” last i checked no one mentioned better or worse
I mean, that’s technically post war.
Even if it’s just a Sexton built by the Aussies in the 1950s.
Verdi-2 would be 10.7 at least considering that the Stormer HVM is 10.3.
If the Ajax was added without missiles it would likely be 10.7, based on BRs of the PUMA, Namer, Strf 9040c, etc. It would be hard to say where an Ajax with missiles would go, but it most likely wouldn’t be higher than 11.3.
Edit: Actually, if the CTA 40 was enough to push the Ajax to 11.3+, the Verdi-2 would be 11.0 at the very least as well.
Not sure why you think we shouldn’t get the QE then?
South American.
carrier defensive armaments are a thing too.
Edit: NVM, even though it is quite new it seems it only has autocannons and machine guns, so could be added immediately
Then you’ve nothing to worry about, the QE only has 3 Phalanx CIWS for air defense
That was me asking you why you’re making yhe better or worse comparison, the same thingnive asked you twice