Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

just for the SU-27/33 and give the 33 the anti ship missile it could carry, imagine being a naval fighter without any anti-ship capabilities

1 Like

Rafale M: yeah, imagine 🫩

2 Likes

I don’t think so

There have been fighters without anti ship capabilities all across naval aviation history

list some of them

yea i am talking in game and Su-33 had anti-ship missiles irl, and yea i agree with Code 649 list some

The 9.3 lineup they specifically ruined to help fill out a non-existent 9.7 lineup
Justice for the AMX-32 (120)

You are so wrong on this one. Sure it might be modelled similarly but thats a whole different upgrade package than 2PL

1 Like

Fairey fulmar, early war grumman f4f wildcats, f2a buffalo (purely strafing isnt really anti ship) sea hurricane, wont go any further due to going further back

Great i’ll add it to the other 24 Slightly different leopard 2’s already in game

they could carry torpedoes pal, or anti ship bombs and naval mines

Show me any one of the aircraft i listed armed with a torpedo please, or mines

indeed, you’d be wrong.

I’d say it is either no C&P or it is. In this case it is not. It’s a variant. (Its 3D model is also different and not copied over from the German one).

You could argue that you, and others, would like to see more variants that are less similar to already implemented vehicles (and personally I’d agree), but putting a label on every variant as C&P hurts your argument more.

4 Likes

Doesn’t it get bombs?

dumb bombs not even anti-ship ones, also give the EXOCET to France

Do you expect Gaijin to just make up non existing vehicles at this point? With such logic every Leopard 2 based vehicle could be considered as a copy of the 2A4. Same goes for M1 Abrams, T-72, T-80, F-16, F-15, Su-27, MiG-29 and so on and so on…

3 Likes

Oh is it gen 2? That’s cool

Edit - it’s gen 1 as far as I can tell? Is it literally just the zoom that is different or what?

image

image

So you think any changes whatsoever to a vehicle, no matter how small, even something like a different roof MG, mean it should no longer be considered copy-paste? Surely you can see that the vast majority of people will not share that opinion.

But they exist, look in suggestions

hi @Smin1080p_WT Do you know if the M-346 has plans to receive Fire and forget ordnance for A2G? Currently it only has laser guided stuff which is somewhat suboptimal at that BR range

I guess, but its not like they aren’t used as anti-ship weapons. Naval Phantom doesn’t get dedicated anti-ship weapons either.