Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

And… yeah, just as I suspected, they are waiting until Friday to release the Abrams post.

They intend to just press the “post” button right before shutting down, going home and forgetting about it, or about any feedback, or about any solutions, until the Major update is released next week as however they want with no regard for anything.

6 Likes

They know for sure that the abrams drama is probably going to be intense so they are putting it off either to reduce drama with how they write the post or to quickly release the update and forget about it

i expect nothing more than a cheap excuse as to why there not gonna buff the hull armour then take 0 feedback over the weekend then release the update with the sepv3 being in its current state

lmaoo this game is going to die if gaijin doesn’t change something up, every update has gotten worse and worse since i started playing. especially the last 4 felt like we got literally nothing new, i can think of 2 new vehicles then i just forget because of how boring and copy paste the new stuff has been

Nope, it won’t

Whales are far from an extinct species here

Hahahaha, but it’s true! Instead of stressing myself out by simply putting ideas directly into the chat, I manage it with an AI, but it didn’t generate everything on its own, hahahaha. I put in a main idea and refine it with the AI. Besides, I provided a lot of context throughout the week regarding documentation.

You don’t get it, because the documentation on…
checks notes
A 6 year old tank doesn’t give PRECISE RHAe numbers for KE and CE of the new protection gaijin cannot change anything whatsoever, as they would never use educated or uneducated guesswork…

-_-

Please avoid AI, use of it here is pretty frowned upon

3 Likes

Better than using AI in the visual design of some premium AI vehicles.

1 Like

I hate it soo much, especially when it comes to slop.

People like to use slop to make their whining sound less whiny.

2 Likes

lmao good one

That Abrams post won’t be giving any meaningful info. Over 1K players also commented on F-14D threads, voted on the poll, F-14D suggestion post was the largest ever created,

and then all we got was 2 brief rejections by Grom and a complete ignorance in the dev letter.

fair enuff ig.

Still, it’s not really a good thing

I just got to the bit when he says ban C&P vehicles out right, like your seriously joking so no British B-29’s no British Mustangs ect like those “C&P” too ?

1 Like

But I don’t use AI to express my opinion; I use it to organize my ideas, ideas that sometimes slip from my mind. Companies use it daily to save time, prepare for meetings, and so on.

i think he meant more like “oh heres a leopard now heres a premium leopard and a sqaudron leopard and an event leopard and a subtree leopard and 9 more subtree leopards and 3 more premium leopards”

My opinion is my own, and the way I present it may sometimes be a little different. But the idea still came from me.

are you serious? SOME copy and paste is fine, if its to fill a slot or add some type of vehicle a nation doesn’t have, but not this crazy amount of c&p that they are doing now (which is mostly prems)

I haven’t seen that video and it already looks iffy as hell.

After seeing the thumbnail I checked something…

On steamcharts it literally saw an increase in players from 2018 till now.
image

4 Likes

Yeah, pretty much.

You’re not the one who’s sharing it though, the AI is sharing it.