Statisticaly incorrect by a wide margine the 2a7v is by stats the best tank in top tier, the abrams is well bellow that and soviet/russian made tanks. Look it up
1 Like
Enough with the nerfs. Nerf this, nerf that… that is NOT the way.
-The Abrams should retain their 5 second reload.
-The SEPv2s should get M829A3.
-The SEPs and V2s should get their turret armor fixed.
-The Abrams should get their turret rings fixed…
JUST LIKE:
-CR3TD should have a 5 second reload.
-All CRs should get their first order racks fixed.
-All CRs should get their missing spall liners.
-Merkava Mk.4s should have their armor fixed.
-Leclercs should get their UFPs and mobility fixed.
Type 10 should get its mobility fixed.
Etc.
Stop believing that X needs to be nerfed because Y is worse, and start thinking that instead Y should be fixed to be closer to X.
6 Likes
so should things like the Luclerc just stay mid as hell because france has a 2A6? and in the future a 2A8
Its mediocre in hands of bad player, but if the player is good,then its absolute beast.
any buff and they lose it thats just how it has to be or buff the reloads on the other 5 second reload tanks how is that so hard to understand??
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
France wasn’t mediocre up until—you guessed it—the updated modules, the same the Abrams got and made it a glass cannon.
Every Leclerc was fairly good, with a good performing round and postpen, mobility and base 5s reload time with its autoloader.
Now all that it takes is a BMPT to fire wildly at them to get either FCS or the basket in a couple rounds (or straightup take them out).
1 Like
Why
I literally said that the Leclercs should get their UFP armor and mobility (acceleration, agility) fixed, am I not being read?!
4 Likes
because with
they will far out preform the Challenger 2s and Arieetes how is this so hard to understand? again if you dont want to nerf anything then buff the reload of those tanks to 4 seconds we already have the type 90 and type 10 with 4 second reloads
my guy was that response to you or someone else it isnt all about you lmao
Ariete AMV can be a beast if played by a Top player too.
I guess that means Ariete AMV is altchually the best tank ingame too, even better than the 2A7s!
When did people start judging tanks based off how they can be used by Top players instead of their average performance with average players…?
So how about decompression? BR nerfs? Why is your only solution an unrealistic reload nerf?
2 Likes
It will not vastly outperform the Black Night nor the 2E.
Everything outperforms an Ariete tbf, even Merkavas. I don’t get your point by gatekeeping around mediocre vehicles by Gaijin’s own fault.
M829A3 wont get added,its not improvement to M829A2. Its already been said,nothing like anti-ERA tip is modelled…
guess we are ignoring a buff to the other 5 second reload tanks then lol
The naval Buk is nice to see, but I do wonder if we might also get naval Tor …
after all, we already have some ships which can use it !
1 Like
Look you can throw passive agressive remarks but stats do not lie
“
“The player with thousands of matches across every nation’s Top Tier in the game is altchually a U.S. fan’boy’ “
Do you see how stupid it sounds to claim that I want 1 nation to “stomp” (“even more” lmao) over all others WHEN I SPENT HUNDREDS OF HOURS AND EUROS GRINDING ALL OTHERS?
All I want is for ALL nations to have equal chances against each other, because I play, you guessed it, all nations.
I speak for the Abrams just like I speak for the Merkavas, Leclercs, Challengers, Type 10s, ZTZ99s, VT4, ETC.
Me advocating for a tank only happens to ever be an issue when said tank is an Abrams. There’s no U.S bias on my end, there’s only U.S hate on yours.
So enough with the “Avenger is a U.S. main” nonsense.
9 Likes
What are you even talking about, completely dodged my question like a politician