Why is this still an argument when Italy has arguably the best 2A7 in the game?
It’s not like Italy is only relying on their Arietes anymore. You can make the case around accuracy or balance in a vacuum, but Italy had its underperforming MBT issue fixed a while ago.
4 Likes
nah, give it aim9M and aim7P in the tech tree. Much better kit than AMRAAM that would increase its BR a lot.
I do wonder if there is ARMs and AShMs we haven’t seen yet, I would hope that’s the case since there was barely any AShMs in the trailer…
I need my Exocets, Kh-41, Kh-31A/35s… etc.
the Leo 2A7V isnt the only tank in the game, maybe it should be nerfed instead of buffing the Abrams to be even better then other tanks that sit with 5 second reloads its that simple
not really every NATO aligned country has better reload and survivability (bar weird ERA interactions with explosives) also besides japan they get far better gun handling than anything soviet or chinese i would rather play my M1A1 over my T-72b3 if told i could only play.
having a single 2A7 doesnt change the Ariettes sitting at 11.7 having the same reload as an abrams for some reason while being drastically worse
The testbed was an F-14A airframe retrofitted with F-14D systems for testing.
to be fair if you’re grinding out the Italian TT you want to play the Ariete not another German tank for the hundredth time i would want the Ariete competitive too since its armour package is underperforming by alot
It could be Astra mk 1 which is used by su 30mki
But the paint scheme doesn’t match
So all 87 F-14D & (-D(R)) airframes would need to have been returned to the factory to have the wiring done?
And besides, the Pylons you are referring to (LAU-97/A) are entirely modular and detachable;
it wasnt just F-14D systems
Here’s the thing;
I want EVERY 12.7 tank, including the Abrams, to move forward as much as possible to become true 2A7 counterparts.
Meanwhile, you want to nerf the 12.7 Abrams to make it more comparable to 12.0-12.3 tanks because “it’s better than them”, making the gap between the 2A7s and everyone else even bigger.
The Abrams should retain their 5 second reload.
The SEPv2s should get M829A3.
The SEPs and V2s should get their turret armor fixed.
The Abrams should get their turret rings fixed…
MUCH LIKE
CR3TD should have a 5 second reload.
All CRs should get their first order racks fixed.
All CRs should get their missing spall liners.
Merkava Mk.4s should have their armor fixed.
Leclercs should get their UFPs and mobility fixed.
Type 10 should get its mobility fixed.
Etc.
Because its the FA version (Fighter Attack). Its capable of both and has a grifo-346 radar. Which isnt AESA, but very good. Should be similar to Gripen C radar
Can you for once stop coping about Abrams,its literally best MBT ig atm. 2A7HU is second,followed by Strv 122s and then 2A7V.
1 Like
no I want to nerf the reload on ALL 120 Abrams, there is more then just 12.7 I fully agree with giving the later Abrams their DU hulls but they frankly shouldnt have 5 second reloads when you compare it to the current tanks that have 5 second reloads, unless gaijin is willing to buff the Ariettes and Challengers to 4 seconds like the Type 90s
The whole ‘I want to play muh Ariete’ is background noise. You got a working tank at top tier, arguably the best MBT in the game.
And besides, even if someone likes the Ariete’s looks or they simply like the tank, they have to be deeply masochistic to play any variant beyond the Ariete (P).
Whatever you say lmao
2 Likes
Ik you are giga US fanboy and just want them to stomp even more. But its literally the best tank you can play atm. You have second best reload, best mobility and unlike Type 10,you have actual armor that can also stop rounds. And also second best round.
2 Likes
Abrams is not the best. Its capable of everything, but it has no strong capability. Its mediocre.