Why not just a BR increase? Let the abrams be as accurate as possible
13.7 with the F-14 airframe and FM would kinda hurt even with AIM-120s ^^
Still trying to decipher based off of the update teaser trailer whether this is a CAS-heavy or feature heavy update… and there’s still stuff we haven’t seen yet lol.
Dev stream tomorrow will be interesting.
With this though its a trade from the claim to realistic that warthunder holds to, because that is just the abrams with a fully trained crew
Nuclear power ship in main WT naval wow
Comes before US nuclear power carrier lol
reloads are a purely balancing feature, otherwise we could have challenger 2s with sub 4sec reloads but we dont
If Gaijin had just added the SEPv3 alongside the 2A7V, which are true counterparts, the Abrams as a whole likely wouldn’t have received the 5 second reload buff.
1 Like
You wouldn’t be able to turn half as decent as you can now at speed with regen steering.
And I’m not saying crazy speeds either, beyond 40km/h, it would certainly be noticeable.
and Shermans with 3s/sub 3s reload
and BMPs with 2 second reloads
so much low tier stuff has far too long a reload
oh and the 105mm L7 at 6.7 seconds, despite being lighter and easier to load than 120mms with a currently quicker reload
It’s absolutely CAS heavy
pretty much but here we are
1 Like
Yeah… i know i just want to see more focus on nato nations being treated like non nato nations.
You could call it a CAS update if top tier CAS wasn’t already dead from the Pantsir SM
I mean technically nuclear power was used for submarines first, wasn’t it ?
Now i wonder if we’ll see this in September :
Big forehead
3 Likes
it wouldn’t need the reload if the multitude of errors with armor and survivability were corrected.
For some reason Gaijin seems to be happy with sitting on multiple year old reports having done nothing with them.
3 Likes
Looks like Megamind.
3 Likes
Now show the ACTUAL post-penetration effects xD
Most hull shots on the green area of the 3TD hit nothing of importance because it’s hollow; it had no modules and the turret crew sits high into the turret, and the hull spall liner does wonders too.
All hits on the Abrams hull, on the other hand, lead to either full crew death or absolute disablement via 2-crew member death AND hydraulic pump, turret basket (turret ring) destruction, etc; none of which the CR has.
I am so tired. It’s impossible to discuss any vehicle without British mains having to make of it a competition about how bad Britain has it and how everyone else should be nerfed instead of having the British vehicles improved too.
4 Likes
“CQB” and “>40 km/h” are kinda contrary?
you mean like the abrams having a faster reload than anything bar a type 10 thats what you get in return for worse armour its called balance
Surely people aren’t still saying that “T-90M2” is coming instead of T-90M (Arena-M) is coming…