Thank you for your response. Can I also ask how they will be functional? Will it just be the green box with the name of the target floating over it? like it is rn? like it was in the early days of radars beeing introduced in the game? Where the green UI-element box was shown in 1st person view?
When we have some more final details we are able to share we will hopefully update things info wise.
The ariete are better than the challengers because you actually survive shots when hull down due to the spall liners in the cheeks. Its why i still somewhat play 11.7 italy but not britain.

The Abrams just feels incredible in terms of acceleration, even compared to tanks with a similar engine HP and weight.
There not as quick as other mbts like the abrams but they have better acceleration and handling than the challengers.
i guess a spall lining is something. still awful
A good change, lets hope they keep to it and not revert it again.
Thank you very much. I just hope it will be well integrated into the gamemode and individual planes (hopefully with dadicated MFDs UIs per-plane like the radar screen on the Gripens or F-18s)
Lack of turret armour helps ironically, no one aims for your breach because of it lol. Plus no ammo in the turret and a 5 second reload with dm53 always helps.
In the challenger its behind its cheeks where not many people aim or even pen, the ariete has so little most shots hit and pen but do no damage. Most of the time ill have a single crew member taken out where as on the challenger ill have either my entire turret nuked or my breach and 2 crew members. No massive forehead weakspot also helps alot.
that is true. the ariete is the only tank at top tier where im not cutting their canon off first, because im turning their gunner and commander into paste first.
The Black night isnt bad at all tbf. Its just when your aps rusns out and people shoot your mantlet trunion holes and get loader, comander and sometimes gunner if your hit at the right angleπ
I would love all of these new modules IF they also bothered to fix armor and survivability.
These modules are weaknesses that would be balanced out with proper armor and survivability strengths.
Yet⦠they model the weaknesses, but NOT the strengths that would balance them out.
For instance, where are the damn LFP spall liners of the CR2s which were reported years ago with literal photographic evidence?!
Jokes on you, i still have two pasta bois left to send you a dm53 package.
Ignored as per im afraid π
im out-reloading your crew seat swap
True, but i dont play above 11.7β¦ Thats assuming im even playing 11.7 as most of the time im playing 4.0 ground now.
Bold of you to assume im even within 1km of your position.
