What does it mean by full colour, arent all HMDs full colour
DASH (older versions) and JHMCS I are not
This isn’t about “heavily nerfing” the Challengers. These are planned chnages that have been coming in for several top tank series.
Im afriad you keep approaching this the wrong way. This is not something done out of “spite” to “nerf the Challengers” or something. These are planned and scheduled model updates to include detailed modules that the community voted on for modern tanks. It is not spesific to the Challengers and already present on other tanks.
These changes are independent from any existing reports or suggestions.
1 Like
It just means that it can display information in a full range of colours instead of just one. So you can use different colours to convey information to the pilot instead of/along with various shapes.
I think the only thing us Challenger 2 players can hope for is it gets so bad it drops down in BR to 11.3 so it can avoid top tier
3 Likes
weather there planned and schedules changes or done out of spite doesnt matter, its the fact the challengers alredy a pitiful top tier tank and instead of focusing on fixing the issues of the tank they decided to prioritize giving it more issues making it practically unusable at its br instead of just rescheduling spending actual times on the dozens of accepted reports and making the tank good, and from what i know the challenger is the only top tier mbt with a power system which is a horrible module btw because it just awards players for terrible shots
5 Likes
Im sorry, but this doesn’t explain why bug reports are being ignored, positive changes are gone back on and things haven’t been fixed (some after years) - the people working tirelessly on the vehicle are starting to become, ironically, tired; because their voices seem to not matter as Gaijin take their bug reports and do whatever they want anyway, usually against the wishes of the people trying to help the vehicle.
Its disrespectful.
The new modules were expected yes, however this is about things that have been reported for years to no amendment. Failing that, they are amended completely wrong and the complaints there after are also ignored. That or we have to keep running in circles with the dev team and report managers in order to reach a compromise of something, despite the evidence.
2 Likes
Oohhh ok
Inb4 something something insult
1 Like
Due to the use of colourful language. Please let’s keep it within the lines.
1 Like
No, just direct breaches of the forums guidelines
Always Be Civil
Nothing sabotages a healthy conversation like rudeness:
- Be civil. Don’t post anything that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, or hate speech.
- Keep it clean. Don’t post anything obscene or sexually explicit.
Profanity isn’t required to make a point or proove anything. Its possible to disagree or be critical without it.
3 Likes
Try Number 2 to get a Official comment
Reports are not being ignored here. These changes are independent of any reports.
Reports are reviewed separately and worked on wherever possible. These changes are not connected to that.
1 Like
We’ve already responded to this both here and in the report itself. As mentioned, a new report with new information is welcome.
2 Likes
So we could re-report it with the text written from AspectOfTheRAGE ?
No. New information / sources. Not just a re-write.
1 Like
But everything was allready written in it, the clarification what Gen.3 ERA is and so on…
3 Likes
oh yeah ? surely those kind of reports will be reviewed soon then :)
4 Likes
Honestly remove L26 and they could go down to 9.7 they have no advantages over the Cheiftain and the Cheiftain has a stronger breach!
3 Likes
How many years has it been since Germany got a leopard? And why does every other nation keep getting leopards every update?