Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

okay nuke event is nice and all but not only it needs way more work it doesnt counteract having space thunder, that future thunder with railgun tanks etc as a regular thing

They bring back some events, like we had the Tailspin event come back for a second time before, and the Nuclear Thunder event is going to return as a permanent game mode at some point.

I do wish they’d bring back some other events on a regular basis though like the Battle of the Atlantic, and the Great War event (either with new WW1 rewards or just have WW1 properly in the game).

Why y’all unnerfing the BMPT accuracy? At least reduce its damage to gun barrels if youre gonna do that.

Hi @Smin1080p_WT Are there any plans to implement the Python 4 for Israel in this update? Currently, Israel is the only nation without a Tier 9 fighter equipped with an AESA radar in the tech tree, which creates a significant imbalance. Therefore, we would like to see the Python 4 introduced as a countermeasure. It would likely have less impact on the battlefield than at least 12 AIM-120D missiles.

1 Like

you did not fixed it yet but make it worse, does not make sense for chally 2

1 Like

Let it go man. You’ll only hurt yourself more.

anybody know if the sep v3 gets gen 3 thermals in the dev i cant tell

yup.

no it doesn’t i just realized

It still has 2nd gen thermals for some reason

1 Like

i assume no updates on ALARMs coming to any other planes and no updates on NT going lower then 13.0

2 Likes

Same as they would not fix ground launched spikes lmao.

I just got on the Dev now to look, the SRC Radar is E band and the tracking radar is J band for the iTO…so you should still be able to fire at them…but like some have said, if they don’t use the SCR Radar even though looking at them the SRC Radar is elevated so it should be on :/

The resistance of the ld10 pl12a pylon in the dev server is increased. Does gajin understand that the resistance of the pl12 pylon is unusually large? Is this a kind of differential treatment? It’s like murdering China’s top aerospace.

1 Like

oh by the way just tested on the public test devserver and it would appear that they disabled the ability for arms to target aircraft for some reason which they also noted in the changelogs. not sure why but they did. any chance they’ll add that ability back in later?

didnt realise they changed the name of the f16c late
image

They have CM/mods so they can soak up all the rage and hate that otherwise would ride on the devs…

1 Like


@Smin1080p_WT
Will all of the M1A2 series of Abrams receive this new hull armor profile next update? Because it seems right now only the M1A1 has it on the dev server. Thanks!

4 Likes

1 vehicle, I brought up 2

Why, for example, is the initial ammunition of the T-90M 3BM42 instead of 3BM46, the initial ammunition of the M1A2 SEP series M829 instead of M829A1, and the initial ammunition of the Leopard 2A5/6/7 DM33 instead of DM43?We all know that before the ariete AMV entered the official servers, its initial ammunition DM33 was replaced by CL3143, just like the Centaur 2’s initial ammunition is also CL3143. Why not give players better ammunition instead of using these worse types of ammo?I won’t bring up the story about the strv122 initially using dm23 ammunition, with dm33 in the level one development equipment slot.

2 Likes