Gaijins whole bug reporting system and the people behind it arent very good (Smin aside)
Its planned to come this major.
Linking this wall of text, for all to see how badly the devs are doing their job.
7 Likes
Their system encourages people to repeatedly have to spam reports of the same issue, rather than improving existing reports.
I have no idea why they choose to do this.
We have no “agenda” to push here. We are here to help as best we can and provide the answers that we can. Those answers come from the developers. Sadly we cant have answers for each individual thing. Nobody is turning a blind eye. We can provide as much help, guidance and assistance in what best to do. Getting hostile towards us is not going to resolve anything.
I would appreciate if you could stop spamming nonsense at this point please.
one thing im confused about, how does the BMPT have this mechanic? The Puma has a single cannon and dual feed, the BMPT has two cannons with their own feeds each?
Although the Scorpion is compatible with Belgium’s F-16AMs, is this update only for the F-16C?
It is yes. Scorpion is not planned for the Belgian AMs.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT will there be a fix for Aircraft shaders and the CDK this major update or is atleast any fixes planned for the terrible state it’s currently in?
The CDK is a separate developmental item to the major update. Any fixes there would come at a different time to the games major update.
As always, we encourage reporting any CDK issues on the CBR too. As it has its own subsection there: Community Bug Reporting System
There system encourages spam reports then closes reports for being duplicate
They deny reports using primary sources and very clear evidence of something due to stupid reasons
if you can magically get a report accepted after digging deep into the internet for a declassified document thats good enough for them theres still a high chance you wont see that implemented for up to 3-4 years (most challenger reports for exmple)
and they go through some reports until they find the worst possible thing to implement weather its correct or not (the m1128 reload for example)
and sometimes they accept reports implement them on a dev server then there no where to be seen on live (the reworked challenger 2 armour for example)
3 Likes
The piece of code can be found in the missile launcher of the BMPT and as you can see in the attached video it works Perfectly fine.
Its forwarded
The system encourages drafting bug reports using OS file systems & Word Processors such as MS Word, LibreOffice, etc prior to posting bug reports.*
Doesn’t change objectionable dismissals of bug reports, but that’s what it encourages.
The devs are their own individual people though. They can just say no and there is very little a bug report mod or a CM would be able to do about that.
Oh no. So in the end, the F-16AM just has fewer countermeasures, and they aren’t adding the radar HMD or Scorpion HMD after all.
Hey there Smin!
I did look at the Evidence at what the Developers used and it makes no sense.
- The 3rd Generation ERA is stated to be Relikt
- The Sentence where it states "Modern Reactive Armours (Explosive Reactive Armour; ERA) like the 3rd Generation ERA (Relikt) Which are also being retrofitted on russian Main Battle Tanks, Including older Models (For Example Used in MBTs T72B3, T90M/MS) is entirely About the Relikt ERA (Which yes the Leopard 2s Cant Penetrate) and not K5.
Note: You can also see in the same Picture talks about KE2020Neo which is a Round being developed to go through Relikt.
Which Literally means that The Entire Response about DM53 not going through K5 is not only about a Whole Different Subject (the Paper literally shows about the Talks of a new round which is KE2020NEO) But it also states No mention of K5 as a whole.
7 Likes
Yeah I made already reports for it there a few months ago but the CBR managers are blaming user error I have made a second report containing all relevant information again as there is no way to contest closed reports or reopen issues.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ycvJ1zQgK5hD
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dnnnfj8D5NS0
It isn’t a CDK only issue it is something that was broken by the major update last year and now is marked as not a bug with a hand waymve excuse CDK issue are always being hadnwaved away as user error which greatly upsets me.
he cant even do anything either, he’s just a forum mod essentially
1 Like