because L27A1 buffs arent allowed. /j
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Please, could you answer.
Preferably, inquire the devs even. Seeing as they lack the basic understanding on things they’re adding to the game, and aren’t objective in the slightest.
1 Like
Can we get War Thunder 2 please?
1 Like
Ty mate
I known 😬👻
I’ve already answered. New information is required for a new report. The devs have already reviewed all of the included information and laid out whats required in the response.
Funny thing, this is literally the dev’s reasoning as to why Leopard 2s don’t have their Swedish Trials levels of armor.
Literally “we couldn’t do it, so neither can they”. I know this from a former tech moderator btw.
7 Likes
AGAIN, WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM US
You have DND, you have Bundestag saying it’s Relikt, but the devs ARE CONVINCED DM53 can’t defeat Kontakt-5, THEY CAN’T READ.
7 Likes
I want to believe in that case. Seems like one of the more interesting packs of the patch.
1 Like
Did you even read the report?
I read the report in full. It was me that passed it on.
I do not decide on the outcomes. This is down to the developers.
3 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2HUu10ZEZYy5
@Smin1080p_WT could you review this report?
A similar thing happened with L27A1 where they claimed the report cited from the British MOD may not have been talking about Kontakt 5.
Despite the fact it specifically stating it was referring to the “KE sensitive ERA of the T80U tank” - What else exactly would it be talking about?
What else exactly could this be - Their reasoning is just ridiculous.
13 Likes
we need new devlopers
(kidding)
Spoiler
(not really)
Kontakt 1 t80u i guess
This is something I wish people were more aware of;
Every time CMs and Mods take flak for the Developers’ decisions, people are shooting at the messengers who try their best to ensure communication.
It’s not the CMs or Mods’ fault that the Devs make these decisions.
1 Like
Forwarded as a suggestion.
It was nice of gaijin to invent that specific model of T80U for this report reply
I didn’t realise K1 was “KE sensitive ERA”
You know, just saying something like “Anti-ERA ability on several ammo types on several nations will drastically ruin Soviet/Chinese winrate on several BR’s, so we couldn’t add it” is better than all of those “marketing lie”.
Is this in relation?
It definitely is their fault. As they are the people we as a community can talk to and when these people also turn blind eye to reports same as the devs then that’s just pushing their own agenda.