what they should do with the american M1A1 AIM is make it the american M1A1 AIM that they used with the usmc instead of the australian one
are you sure i hadnt had a look but wouldnt it be wierd for the m1a1 to have a completly different turret basket when the m1a2, m1, and the other m1a1 variants share it and the regular onew doesn’t
what i think is new basket model: only on the m1a1 which is also currently the only one testing the volumetric turret ring as well, i think their just using the m1a1 to make all the new additions.

regular m1

m1a1HC
m1a2

m1a2v3
fair enough i assumed all the controls were handled through the top ring but it makes more sense to be that one area at the bottom
these have been in game for over a year.
The AIM we have now is staying in America
yeah which is why im confused why the techtree’s m1a1 basket is different
it been a year shouldnt that have been fixed if its from back when they were added?
Yes. Ideally it should either be reskinned or removed after placement in British tree.
why though that never goes over well with the community
I think that was the original design then it got more detailed so it might be a hold over either way only the floor or the ring will stop the turret.
ah, okay that makes sense
It was done before. It is not a KT105 or Coelian, analogues or the exact same vehicle would still be researchable.
But yes, somehow people do not really want tree mashups or relocations.
Does Gaijin still remember the promise made to players to reduce the BR of planes equipped only with the python3 missile?You only care about things that can make money, like Netz (mod). Its BR has indeed been reduced, but what about other planes? Nobody plays them, so there’s a lack of reference for combat efficiency. Could it be that they are so bad that no one would play them at all?





Im not sure what you mean here regarding a “promise” to universally lower every plane with Python 3.
any update regarding an upgraded f15e or f15ex coming soon?
Aaah Smin, you’re finally awake
There are some L27A1 reports that need a… second opinion
I’m sure @Morvran or @Kobes-Kamov will be along shortly to point you in the right direction, that or @Rzi4628-live is about to blow your notifications up hehe
Not this major.
If there is new or additional information after the devs reponse, a new report can be made as suggested
aw thats unfortunate
Like I said in the SEPv3 thread. It isn’t really about realism, it’s about pretending to care about realism while they mostly just do whatever they “believe”.
Morning smin; Do you know if the Mig-21-2000 has Derbys planned? pretty sure the the suggestion passed to devs included those & It’d be a shame if this mig 21 with a good radar & HMS couldnt make use of radar missiles :) tysm

