Just the way you phased made it seem like there’s way more vehicles than Russia using the 2A42 which just isn’t true. Finland has one vehicle which is now unusable, China has maybe 2 vehicles using it, again I don’t remember their cannons of the top of my head then we have Russia.
i havent personally dealth with much cas spam but idrk
yeah my bad but still it is a factor
So just Finland/Sweden
So the nerf basically effects swedens only 10.7 heli and their only Finnish IFV that was worth playing despite being terrible. Small price to pay I guess, honestly forgot the Moderna uses it. Thats my favorite vehicle on Slovakia
I really wanna know what these other Indonesian tanks are
for cope reasons yk
think the LMUR arc is above the new abrams APS anyway.
LMUR is the only FNF ATGM with an actual top down arc
please be Harimeow please be Harimeow
Given the Thai addition was three, I’m thinking this’ll be three vehicles too,
One is the 2RI of course
Hoping for a 8.0-8.3 light tank (Scorpion 90 :pray:)
and Harimeow :3 personally
How come the M-346 is not going to the Israeli tech tree? They use the aircraft and if I’m not mistaken it’s going to come with the Derby missile…
I remember someone asking about them and Smin saying something along the lines that plans change
A minute of silence for Artevelde, a Belgian ship currently placed at the German bluewater tree mistakenly.
And somehow “Bluewater” tree, as a frigate
Usually the host tech-tree gets the vehicle first, then user nations get them on latter updates
For instance the British got the Hawks 200 for their tech-tree, then followed by a user nation (Indonesia) the following update (Hawk 209)
well if its delayed, then hopefully its a new model, which makes me think its the Harimau
The third vehicle is interesting though, what else would require a new model? My guess is the BTR-4M
I guess we’ll have to see. Thanks for the reply.
Did indonesia already operated the buk mb2k?iirc they buy that ADS from belarus,that will really good addition for jap tech tree (Type 03 is not enough for “me” :>)
Pretty much everything off the top of my head?
The Scorp, AMX-13-105, AMX-10PAC, PT-76M etc are all minorly different enough to maybe make modelling from scratch easier than modifying an existing model.
Other things like the BTR4, Badak, and such would all require new models anyway…
Hey Smin, quick question but what is the lowest BR Gaijin intends to have access to ARMs? 10.0?
Talking about Btr 4. I think gaijin already made the 3d model of Btr 4…because 5 years ago that was got leaked.
I think it’s 11.3 or 11.7? Unless there’s vehicles below that with ARMs that I’m not aware of
i was thinking all of them are a bit “easier” to implement since they already have a preexisting thing similar or identical
AMX mle 58 turret and hull is already ingame, PAC90 also the same (MARS-15) etc etc
granted it uses the same turret as the BTR-3E1, but the BTR-4 would constitute an entirely new hull design, which could be time-consuming
of course it could also just be a C&P that has a modified visual looks, like the M24DK. but hopefully its a the former
The lowest I have seen is the Su17 at 10.0. For NATO its the AH1W at 11.0

