SPIKEs prefer to hit the breech of the tank where it does the least amount of damage
Something I noticed, she 's coming w/ the 25mm/87 turrets
Which might be the same variant that have been in WT 's files for a few years, the MK 38 MOD 2
1 Like
dude every possible place i could see a challenger is hours away from me and its super annoying but what was it like?
@Smin1080p_WT Not sure if you answered it yet, but is it possible that the A-7E (10.3 br) is going to get the AGM-88 which it carried irl
sorry, the estimates are only acceptable for non-nato tanks.
2 Likes
Wow they have Tico’s already
few, thank god they added this i was having real trouble with it /j
3 Likes
Those damn supersonic A-10s
5 Likes
Another major update, more love for Israel……… ho wait nvm😒
This would be the single greatest change they could do for M1s. I pray they add it to all of them next update.
theres a new challenger 2 video incase you havent seen it, i really wanna try make a bug report on the turret traverse speed because it looks like its faster than 31
Yeah, the bmpt could abuse a lot of the turret ring, now alongside the dispersion nerf it should be much easier to face them
they added it for all SDBs
because they couldnt give SDB 2 a slower drop speed than SDB 1 they nerfed SDB1
Flame has been very kindly helping me with getting the required images of the documentation for it, so far I have almost all of what I need. It’s been updated with some additional info (the document front pages) so hopefully gaijin takes another look.
3 Likes
thats great news, l27A1 recieving anti era would be huge for the 11.7 challies
1 Like
The trophy on the new SEPV2 is actually working, and can intercept kh38MT’s (from long ranges)? now gaijin is really cooking
1 Like
Videos cant be used for anything time based under most circumstances. A few years ago a Chinese tank report I think? used a video for a bug report, but the poster had sped up the video, resulting in an ahistorical buff. Since then, almost all reports using video evidence alone for anything time based has been rejected. Can be used as a supporting evidence, but thats it.
I do have an accepted report for Harrier landing gear speed being wrong using videos, and I gave multiple different examples, but it also doesnt really affect balance
Not only this, Morvran i want to remind you that currently the MI28NM has internal pilons with LMURs when no evidence photographic exists, and neither public patents and brochure mention it can
Yet you guessed it, estimations for that are fine :))
Yep, another good one
1 Like