Are you saying that the Tornado GR1 would be too OP with ALARM in ARB?
When the feature was established, naturally it is set into plans which vehicles need to be done and how / when they can be done. They are worked through sequentially and through an order.
This is separate from individually reported issues externally.
Please do not twist words out of proportion. Im clarifying that considerations are made across the board.
then why didnt the Tornado Gr4 go up in BR with 9 ALARMs like they could have just limited the ammount to 3 and kept it at 11.3 on the belly, I really dont see the issue with up BRing the plane when its already not got a line up and is being up bred anyway
Hell you up br the italian Tornado because it got HARMs just do the same to the GR1 I really dont get the problem here
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
I promise I’ll stop bothering you, or at least I hope so, but the Rafale, the Mirage 2000, the Super Étendard, the Mirage F1, and others don’t receive the AM39 Exocet missile.
1 Like
I love how Israel is basically left without getting anything decent for yet another update, while the Chinese, Brits, and Americans got a new Abrams, and the Russians got another T-90.
didn’t even get any news for the upcoming subtrees.
im getting the same issue. any fix?
is the talk about the turret neck being taller in WT true? its something ive heard sometimes but not that often.
and is the turret neck still too low in armor?
Any hope for this to be turned down? AI SPAA being able to intercept not only A-G munitions but also A-A missiles with perfect accuracy is a pain, especially now it lets players just circle their AF and be completely immune.
1 Like
is A-7 getting the AGM-122 or AGM-88?
@Smin1080p_WT, since this update deals with a lot of CAS ordnance, could you bump this one for the Alpha Jet A receiving CRV7?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9LLrERUIMSX3
It’s rather a volumes thing.
Speaking of which; it’s being fixed in the Dev Server! So far only M1A1 got the new changes; now the ring is roughly 160mm thick LOS on average, so no more autocanons massacring Abrams frontally through the center of mass!
1 Like
i’m not too sure about that
1 Like
Hopefully that takes a few spall shards away from the crew center mass as well from darts
i know, but i remember people were saying it should be like 200-300 LOS.
and i mean the turret being too high up exposing the ring even more, thats what im not sure is true or not
1 Like
oh my god… i cant get on the dev server through web login.
@Smin1080p_WT Yo mate, would you mind saying something about hull protection regarding the Abrams series? Especially for the M1A2C hull upgrade, which is clearly confirmed by the budget request
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HLpbNtxdiUhE
1 Like
great decision giving the worst top tier tank the worst module in the game then nothing to make it better like idk spall liners or a ready rack fix that you have clear evidence of and have done nothing after years
7 Likes
Why does ALARM require radar lock to transmit? This should be a bug, right
As I said, the changes so far have ONLY been applied to M1A1; you are using M1A2T there!
1 Like