turret baskets being implemented so poorly considering the hull floor is somehow part of the turret drive damage model? and im mentioning those 2 things because you have photo and video evidence of the spall liners and ready rack for the cr2 with bug reports that have been accepted for over 1000 days yet fake nerfing the worst top tier tank is somehow more important?
1 Like
ARMs are not just for Ground Battles, but can be used for SEAD effectively in air modes too.
It was clearly meant to simulate the extra weight of, uh…
Of…
Uh…
Driver getting fatter?
6 Likes
Okay, which gives almost no XP and doesn’t allow you to kill players, last I heard?
It won’t change the plane’s gameplay
Therefore, adding anti-ship missiles will increase the battle rating (BR) of aircraft, which allows them to kill bots ?
So when do the T - Series autoloaders that are physically attached and rotate with the turret get added to horizontal turret drive modelling?
Thank you for pointing out these new things that were escaping me and the patch notes, hahah!
“War thunder: the game that is slower becoming unhistorical and unrealistic for the sake of unbalance”
1 Like
realistically smin how much RP is someone actually going to get kill SPAA with ARMs, ground vehicles barely give rewards you earn more and faster by just bombing 1 maybe 2 bases
HQ-11 F-band, no F-band anti-radiation missiles used, can’t wait to see players in planes fully equipped with anti-radiation missiles and unable to lock onto the HQ-11’s radar
Ito 90, Osa, spyder, type 03, buk m3 ect is in the same situation, don’t forget to bring AGMs in addition to the anti-radiation missiles.
3 Likes
lmfao
We cannot rule out the possibility that the anti-radar missile is capable of locking onto and destroying aircraft knowing about gaijin lmao
this is actually one of the dumbest balancing decisions they have ever made
Its not just about RP. Consider an airfields entire AA defence is on the menu too.
1 Like
is this new? didnt know the AI could intercept missiles
No need to reply to this, I am just venting a little and i know you’re not responsible for development decisions.
The thing you linked me was from March 2025, the CR2 spall liner report was accepted December 2023. I can’t see the photos attached to the report but I know for a fact that attention has been raised to the missing LFP and hull side spall liners since the addition of the UFP and turret liners. I don’t see why the “long time coming” applies to something that was considered and announced more recently than the spall liners that still aren’t implemented.
Its been possible since Nuclear Thunder when AI SPAA code was changed.
that’s been a thing for a while now