Gaijin does not read the forums at all. Nome of the higher devs. None of the small devs. People offered F-14A Late (This thing basically), F-14D(R) or just different 13.0-13.3 capable aircraft to be premiums
1 Like
whats your point bro? one exists, one doesnt
1 Like
Anyways 3 hours for the next riot for dear Yugoslavia fans
Day 1193 of waiting for Polish tech tree
2 Likes
SU-35 Twin R-77’s are real, SU-30SM/2 and SU-27SM Twin R-77 rack aint real either, this is the same proof that claims twin pylon is real.
2 Likes
because part of the job of the CMs is to do that for them
you cant expect all the devs to keep up to date with the forums, its basically a full time job
2 Likes
so today dev stream?
1 Like
It’s not that big of an issue, the aircraft will probably just go to Italy
huh I wonder if gaijin will rework how ASM or missiles interact with ships otherwise I doubt ASM will do a whole lot against BBs and BCs
for example the Sovremenny class only have 8 Moskits which are meant to be really strong but only have 150kg of HE mass, so maybe they will implement actual armour pen to missiles
11 Likes
so the rack is real. If you have proof it outright isnt compatible with su30 or su27sm then make a bug report, because I dont see any reason why it wouldnt be
Guess im watching it on the ride home again ;-;
3 Likes
There’s a difference between technical capabilities of the aircraft and whether it needs such missiles for balance reasons. There’s always a risk of raising BR to a point where it becomes uncompetitive.
I’m not a game designer and don’t decide such things. As of now, it has the same loadout as B.
1 Like
The proof for it being compatible on Su-30 was a Su-30 not even using it
How can you prove something that never existed in the first place
Ru stream if anyone is interested (1 hour later):
https://www.youtube.com/live/7LBDvSJRaZc?si=2PHTMbKSo91vSf8D
I don’t think 13.3 with AIM-7Ps and AIM-9Ms would make it not competitive (ignoring how the F-14B was already over BR and should of had AIM-9Ms anyway)
1 Like
The twin pylon was meant for the SU-35 not the SU-30/27SM, there has not been one proof of those carrying it, the first picture is the proof they claim it can when its clearly single pylon.
1 Like
there are still countries using outdated equipment all over the world, its kinda standard in military to not always use the best stuff, once again there isnt really any reason the su30 couldnt use it
i mean most standard non-wartime patrols use minimal weaponry
this right here is why I hate how gaijin implement buffs we see zero of the proof they exist while if we want to actually change it now need to find a document that specifically states they aren’t real, which is hard to do when if something doesn’t exist it rarely comes up in documents. The closest we could get is a document on the twin racks stating what aircraft they can be mounted on and assuming anything not mentioned wouldn’t be compatible
1 Like
This is designed solely for Russian vehicles/tech trees; it doesn’t align with the us tech tree.u kown wm3
