There’s one, the Leo 2PL
Poland is not a “supporting” nation for Germany. They have the Leopard 2PL because its a Leopard.
The other two Polish vehicles are in the British tree:
6 Likes
the way vehicles goes to different countries is based on politics, geography and history , from what ive been told
hey smin, is this staying permanently or is it for an event
Germany and the Netherlands have a very close partnership between the army and the navy
Is similar capabilities for all nations desired?
After you added fictional vehicles to allow capabilities of CAS for japan, and mbt/helicopter/aim9m on gripen for sweden, why is it not desired to give germany a polish modern vehicle of which they already posess one, just to match the capability gap for the time being? Or is the german tree being treated differently than sweden?
That wouldnt go against the rule of supporting nations vehicles without a dedicated subtree being added to fill out trees
what fictional vehicle, u on abt the su30mkm w its kh38mte?
F-16J probably
they said for CAS, and last time i checked the f16j had dumb bombs and some mavs for cas
As Smin already stated.
Its desired and possible for all nations.
Except sweden
They likely just get screwed in this case.
There is nothing, no offer , no trial
The f16j never existed
In the swedish tree there is the t80u, Mi28, AHS, the gripen featuring weaponry never possesed by sweden. The tiger 2 was never in operable condition to fire the main gun. All 4 vehicles in that configuration are thus fictional, 3 of them no swedish military personal could ever operate irl.
Smin Why dont they Sea harrier have the Sea eagle yet? A bug report was accepted months ago
yk gaijin has never had issues w adding fake vehicles, yk e100, panther 2, tiger 2 10.5cm, coelion, ho-ri production and so on, what makes you think they’ll change up all of a sudden
It’s not limited time like the Wellington is.
Yes, just like the J-7D and MiG-21 Bison: MiG-21 first flight. (2025 article)
All removed,
Ho.-ri production probably removed in the future when suitable replacement is found.
Because atm it sounds like gaijin is not in a mood to fix capability gaps for nations that could easily be fixed by introduction of existing equipment.
So i want to understand why for some nations rules are weakened and broken up completely, while for others they seem to be cast into steel
1 Like
They could try to bolster Sweden in other areas to make up for lack of FnF helicopter but they can’t do that either.
I’m waiting for a response from Smin as to whether gaijin believes our MH-60R have no ability to use Hellfire/JAGM and are waiting for the M299 rails to be delivered and mounted since the US models from Lockheed have been cleared for JAGM use since 2017. Or if gaijin firmly believes that there is no way that the same vehicle model with no changes done somehow lost the ability to use missiles altogether which again goes against prior examples of vehicles getting equipment and the mods to use equipment they couldn’t have used before for balance.
Never used by Sweden? Oh boy it’s a good thing you don’t know about the SAAF Gripen lol
The whole Swedish bias with the Gripen was literally made moot by SAAF Gripens having anything other than dumb bombs for CAS.
They could have done the same for germany.
One of the “3 big main nation” (cant stop laughing) with a relativ small air development, but an extensice groumd development.
Did we get more extensive ground development
Heck no
Depends they never stated Germany has no options for a section of the game did they?