But the viggen can carry 2 9L and 4 120…
@Smin1080p_WT is there any chance we will see the su-33 get it’s anti-ship missile KH-41 this update?
2 Likes
Dont forget MiG-27 at 11.0
IRIS-T SLM datalink shouldn’t disable during terminal guidance // Gaijin.net // Issues
Just ask for them to implement this report
the fact russia gets several 11.0 ARMs while the UK doesnt get a single ARM below 12.3 is so dumb especially when there is literally no shortage of aircraft in game
2 Likes
With everything having it’s placment changed, hopefully the 1A5BE gets moved into the logical line. Example and poll for it found here:
3 Likes
Of course. But the devs said it’s not planned
It would’ve been nice if it had them, though. Russia would finally have a 14.0 jet.
If this is a common reoccurence, then why are they not asking the authors of the related bug-reports whether they can answer certain open questions that come up?
Ofc they may not be able to provide anything further all the time, but they did apparently research the related topic thoroughly enough to get a report on it forwarded…
This should be properly reported here with evidence:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder?from=now%252Fd-6mo&to=now%252Fd
A number of aircraft could receive completely different anti-ship missiles, such as the kh-41, kh-35, and so on, but right now it doesn’t seem to make much sense until the “Nuclear Escalation” mode appears in War Thunder on a permanent basis.
Wondering if this will effect its BR in the future or ammo choices.
This recent major update that’s in development is implementing new mechanics for anti-radiation missiles which also benefits France, but is there any consideration to allowing the Rafale to be able to shoot AASM missiles at radar-emissions?
Rafale’s RWR should be able to create sensor point-of-interest // Gaijin.net // Issues
I agree, but the ALARM would probably be better than the soviet ones. But they should add the AS-37 Martel.
right now we dont know as the ALARM is still just a copy paste AMRAAM, even still the Tornado RET.8 sits at 11.7 with 4 HARMs i dont see why the Tornado GR1 couldnt go to 11.7 with a max of 5 ALARMs
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
Is there any plan to limit the transmitted image in MITL to the resolution the missile seeker actually has? Because currently you get a high resolution IR image from a missile which usually only have a resolution of 64x64, 128x128 or at most 256x256 pixels, which is unrealistic and makes this mechanic much more powerful than it would really be as you can currently scan the battlefield like looking through a targeting pod.
3 Likes
yeah, like the poor sea harriers which are STILL missing their sea eagles.
3 Likes
Ever heard of “hanging chairs”? They’re fixed to the roof because otherwise a mine detonation under the tank would deliver its force into the crew. These seats are standard for seats in modern IFVs and tanks AFAIK. So the argument that the seats have to be fixed to the floor of a tank is stupid of the BRM…
1 Like
guys i have a quick question for my grind, should i get the F/A18C Late or F14 to Superhornet?
Hey Smin. Sorry for the random question, but do you happen to have more information (possibly from the devs) on the new armor plates on the SEPv3 turret cheeks?
They are listed as RHA at the moment, which has a 1.00x armor modifier in game, and the thickness is listed as 150mm. However they only offer about 90mm of protection, which is inconsistent with what they should offer if they were 150mm RHA plates. I assume it’s still WiP, but I was just curious.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Hi smin, hope your Wednesday is treating you well. what is your favourite maritime patrol aircraft and do you happen to know anything about their future in war thunder?