Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

with the absolute surprise of no one…thanks for the info!

1 Like

The Abrams one made my day

No. It states that the german army is in need of a new KE-Penetrator to operate against the newest ERA-generation 3 Relikt.

My beloved italian M-346 not getting a wallpaper all to himself…

Day ruined at 15:42.

1 Like

Hold on… so they gave SEPv3 the extra weight of its additional armor, but without said additional armor…?

This is just… whatever.

14 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT care to give us some information as to why the Devs think Tanks get heavier just for decorations? It’s getting incredibly pathetic

5 Likes

On the other hand, they ALSO made SEPv2 heavier; 64.5 tons (if it had its skirts and without ERA). This matches the sources that I can find, so I suppose it’s fine.

So; the weight increase between SEPv2 and SEPv3 is now “only” 2.3 tons (not amounting for all of the weight-saving measures implemented on SEPv3).

They probably will claim that it all comes from the improved cheeks… 1.15 tons per cheek, apparently.

The cheeks that maybe hold up to half a ton. This is just getting more ridiculous and we will most likely see “because no info” from Smin. Yeah sure and totally not the pretty damn detailed report explaining it all

I wish they brang back being able to cap zones with aircraft

All for two not 150 mm plates, what a joke

At least they have yet to call the Anti-ERA on the A3 shell a marketing lie like they have done so for L27A1 and DM53

What day is it today?

There has been ZERO communication on any of the threads on this matter either

5 Likes

It’s day 1197

1 Like

They know EXACTLY what they are doing, but speak out about it too much you get silenced

1 Like

Weren’t both shells made exactly for the purpose to defeat Kontakt

1 Like

Still just am37 for france?

Yup!

L27A1 was even developed by firing at a T-80U, Primary docs confirm it can pen the UFP with the ERA.

Gaijin doesnt beleive the tests occured when Britain had said T-80U, despite the tests occuring a year after acquistion

8 Likes

150? Not, not 150, but 85; as to why it’s labelled as 150, no idea.

Even frontally it’s 130, not 150;

5 Likes