Why M-346 lack AIM-9M?
Yes and no, M900 is the 105 mm M68 gun series round (supplied by the Belgian company MECAR too). It does have comparable perfomance, but the base M1060 would have slightly less penetration (400 mm @ 60° / 2000 m). The M1060A1, M1060A2, M1060A3 and M1060CV would all have better penetration.
In WT you look at the 30° number:

Belgian 105 mm ammunition
Spoiler
| Designation | Gun | Caliber | Type | Velocity | Weight | Penetration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M393A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HESH | 732 m/s | 11.25 kg | ~127 mm | Belgian copy of US M393A2. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M416 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | Smoke (WP) | 732 m/s | 11.6 kg | / | Belgian copy of US M416. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1001 | NATO 105 mm M68/L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1525 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 985 mm. DST identifies weapon as M68 gun. Likely predecessor of M1050/M1060 |
| M1010 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HE-T | 700 m/s | 12.1 kg | / | 2.0 kg Comp B filler. Belgian indigenous HE round. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1050 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 927 mm. Specifically listed for L7 guns in DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1060 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 980 mm. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1060A1 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | 400 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | First major production improvement of M1060 family |
| M1060A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1460 m/s | 6.2 kg | 440 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Longer/heavier penetrator |
| M1060A3 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1560 m/s | 6.2 kg | >500 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Current KNDS Belgium specification |
| M1060CV | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1620 m/s | 6.2 kg | 560 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Optimized for high-pressure 105HP gun |
| M1061 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-T | 1173 m/s | 10.5 kg | 400 mm | Modernized M456A2 derivative |
| M456A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-T | 1173 m/s | 10.5 kg | ~400 mm | Belgian copy of US M456A2. Confirmed in DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M490 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-TP | Ballistically matched | 20.45 kg complete | / | Training round matched to M456A2 |
| M467 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HESH-TP | Ballistically matched | 20.42 kg complete | / | Training round matched to M393A2 |
| M1008 | NATO 105 mm L7/F1 | 105 mm | Illumination | / | 11.7 kg complete | / | WP illumination projectile |
| M1009 | CN-105-F1 | 105 mm | Smoke | / | 12.8 kg projectile | / | Listed for F1 gun; not specifically L7 |
| Falarick 105 | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | GLATGM | 370 m/s | 24 kg | 550 mm behind ERA | In-game |
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1001 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1010 HE ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1050 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1060 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1061 (M456A2) HEAT ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M393A2 HESH ammunition
Man the one that should actually have better performance against segmented rods actually got the nerf, they really hate the oplot
Gaijin needs to step it up, that’s What! I think at this point adding boats 20’ long with a 30mm gun on the front…is well 😮💨 add the two boats from the trailer…watch the Naval population go Sky High!!!
do yall ever think the tornado IDS MFG thats ingame could recieve it’s AGM88s since irl (idk if its the same variant im pretty sure it is tho) carried them ive also found this saying that they could, idk if its the correct variant of the MFG tho https://www.key.aero/article/when-navy-operated-tornados

Hey.
These are not things that are in any sort of plans for this major. So the reports can be passed as suggestions at a later time. Currently the team are focusing on dealing with reports primarily from the dev server.
Please do not add [DEV] to the titles of reports that are not related to the dev server, as this confuses everyone working on reports when we are trying to tackle priority matters.
We will have more news and details on Nuclear Thunder when the time comes. Now the dev server is the primary focus.
when they will give IRIST SLS into Nomads as better spaa than Elde 98 ?
Just noticed, they seem to be implementing the volumetric on the m1a1, the turret ring is much more protected against autocannons
M1a1
M1A2
Guys any improvemnts to the Spike in dev?
Was trying the Boxer CRV in live, its absolutely horrid … doesn’t even lock on half of the time
It was passed to the devs but that just means it’s a suggestion
When will the devs Folder the NOMADS? Currently it’s takes over 1 million RP to get the NASAMS from the first 12.0 SPAA at rank 8 on Sweden and is the only nation having 4 non foldered vehicles in a row. Yet the devs denied the bug report. Also this is the third or fourth time I’ve asked you about this matter.
Why is the NOMADS not foldered?

i killed a TORM1 and a shilka in test drive w the AGM88A on the american f18 prem and it crashed when the tor died, all other spaa died fine, fuck knows if its a bug w the same game itself or unlucky timing
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
since the pucara is premium, im starting to believe there’s genuinely a game convention stating all turboprops must be premium
The spike loft changes that were mentioned in the russian dev stream only seem to apply to the spike-ER fired from helicopters, which seem to have a much higher angle of attack now. Is this same change going to be applied to spike LR2 as well?
cough


Hunter AFV and Namer 30’s should be foldered
is this real?
Yes it’s on the Yak 130 next to the refilling point


