That is all well and good but I keep thinking F-20 would be a more interesting AMRAAM carrier than some other jets that even in real life got them. Such as Phantom or the Derby carrying F-5.
F-20 would be somewhat comparable to the ARH carrying Kfir and JF-17.
It was and is of course Gaijin’s purview especially since the project was cancelled in the end but personally I think a place beside JF-17 and Kfir C.10 would have been ideal.
I think that is just because it was almost a carbon copy of the FGR2 with better flight performance which also wasnt terrible (AIM9Gs with only AIM-7E or Skyflash at 12.0 hurts tho)
at the end of the day SA is a subtree of the UK so it will almost certainly go to the UK, things like the bismark (the SA Rooikat prototype not the ship) would have gone to the UK if SA was released when the event happened
Ai user detected, cuz that’s just fully made up bs and I have no idea where you got that from. The Chilean F-5s don’t even use Derbys, but the Derby was the only integrated ARH missile it got. No F-5 ever got AMRAAMs ever.
A week or two back we had a discussion about my Ajax mantlet armour report, which you said you’d be happy to take another look at based on it potentially being rejected despite being within gaijins reporting rules.
I understand you’re probably very busy, but I was wondering if you have had the chance to do so?
No AI. Simply confused it. I thought the latest Chilean variant had received AMRAAM but I just checked again it’s Derby as you said as well as Python IV.
It would be hilarious if they waited until Friday so the Dev Server would be over and with the Weekend coming up next, so that there’s no time to provide feedback xd
I mean wouldn’t be the first time that additions are added on the last day of a dev server with zero time to test / bug report issues (Harrier Gr7 comes to mind thing wasnt even on the dev server in its update and spent literal months with game breaking bugs)