Major Update "Firebirds" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

there has been massive disscussion about this, especially comparing this to Brimstone’s announcement. Though it’s not resonable, but loud voice do makes change, and remove it won’t hurt, except people me who likes this special weapon, and someone who want to bomb base by this(though, seriously? get a top plane and still bomb base with it, sounds stupid to me, while grind spade is not so harmful to economic).

omg that was the epitome of bad balancing.

I’d love to see so many sim improvements that would balance the Grom 1 like you say but likely won’t happen.
No one asked but here are they anyways:
-CWIS at airfield. Just one so people can SEAD them or something (no I know a ARM wouldn’t lock onto it but SEAD has a broad spectrum of weaponry/tools)
-Long range weapons that do the same for all nations
-Variable repair timers for different weapons

2 Likes

I just don’t see Grom-1 as a loss.

It still has x6 KH38’s which make it the best CAS in the game.

It still has an absolute plethora of munitions to destroy bases.

It still has GPS munitions if thats something you enjoy.

It’ll be fine.

2 Likes

Can’t wait to play this update when it releases next year lmao

1 Like

He might be thinking of ET, it originally had the other seeker it can have on dev but was changed to the seeker we have on the regular T as was also used.

no, I like it just because it’s a very interesting, a modularized missile/bomb, I may even not use it but still like having it.
Though I still have grom-2.

and it still gets Grom

just without rocket assistance

It’s interesting for sure, but it’s what makes it interesting is what causes the concerns lol.

There’s nothing else like it because I don’t think the game is ready for anything like it.

1 Like

and more explosives, if let me choose, I would use it instead grom-1, though I don’t like to use gps bomb

Like… Raytracing is fun and very beautiful, but i don’t think it’s necessary.

It takes up a lot of resources of someones GPU, makes it very difficult to see when the sun is shining the opposite way and LOW RES players will have an even bigger advantage then you.

And how many people have such a powerful GPU to begin with?

Also… Why haven’t we seen any Hungarian plane for the TT yet?
We’ve only gotten Russian planes and no Hungarian one… When the sub-TT came out, moderators and devs sayed it was coming in the near future… but nothing Hungarian has been implemented yet.

agree

it’s nice in Single player games but for anything PvP you’re just handycapping yourself

still a welcome addition

1 Like

well, at least you can turn it off, so not so much effect

I assume it’s somewhere at the bottom of the priory list

Hungary is also missing a lot of German WWII planes they had, specifically I’d be looking forward to their Fw-190F8

3 Likes

Well… I’d preferred some Actual Hungarian vehicles, Finnish vehicles, BeNeLux vehicles, bug issues fixed and White Rock Fortress map coming back.

1 Like

yes, I agree

but

the guys who do graphics aren’t the ones that make tanks and planes

I assume they worked quite some time for this

2 Likes

They probably did yeah.

They should start fixing the LOW RES advantage.

eh, I assume it’s intentionally staying to keep players with older systems (stone/Bronze age) playing

Yeah, freemium games benefits from as many players as possible.
I don’t really play the modes where that advantage exists but I feel they could add some low res textures to fix the some of the main LOW RES advantages which afaik I know is mainly disappearing shrubs

Australia would supply the Super Hornet, and Canada would provide the Canadian equivalent of the ICE Phantom.

Canada’s IMP/HEP system for the CF-18 to be specific.
Aging Jet/Platform, but constantly upgrading everything else

1 Like