Major Update "Firebirds" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

So I was looking into NIZH ERA and it led me to the Al Khalid and correct me if im wrong but can someone else look into the Al Kahlid and tell me if im crazy but I think its missing
quite a lot of things

DU round , barrel launched ATGMs, rumored APS, better domestic ERA etc

From what I see there’s 3 variants of Al Khalid, I think we only have the base version which is pretty much just an MBT2000 if I’m not mistaken

1 Like

Certainl not wrong for Magic 2 since I played it on F.1CT at the time.

R-27T might have been that reliable on the dev server only as you say.

From what I can tell Al Khalid-1 is the one with all the domestic stuff built in and more modern equipment which happens to be the version we have but im not sure

Damn, that’s crazy.

Bought OES from last discount, totally worth it (from visual aspect at least).

Even with the Targeting speed of the T-80U, the armor in theory is very good on the Oplot, and having the same reverse gear as the MBT-2000 would be very nice on a tank with a small profile and strong frontal armor

2 Likes

Theoretically they could just use Chinese Ammo since most Chinese ammo(even the high performance ones) should be comparable with all old Soviet autoloaders simply because they were made with the size restrictions in mind, unlike later Soviet ammo like 3BM60 that requires a Autoloader with more space to accommodate the longer APFSDS rod

Considering Thailand has bought Chinese Ammo and operates the VT-4, it’s very easy to justify an Thai Oplot with DCT-10 as it’s main shell in my opinion

7 Likes

Yeah, i can research the engines while not having rank III yet… That’s how long i havent played it - new modifications were added a very long time ago.

It’s for Japan, so that means they don’t get it.

You this game Soviet…

Yeah, this is taking to long…

It’s either gonna have targetting speed of T-80U-E1 (40° horizontal, same vertical as T-80U), or T-80U’s targetting speeds.
The best shell is gonna be 3BM42, so VT-4 just wins in that regard

No, not really.

Yes, 3BM44U (3BM44 (3BM42’s other index name) but produced in Ukraine, there’s photos pf the actual shells), there’s also 3BM44U1/2 yet I have only seen and heard about these two being mock ups.

Both image and the round tell about it being perspective development (in text in beggining), with the round having large “MOCK UP” text on it.

That’s just data from it’s ads, in other words, awaited performance.

It would just be better for it if it would recieve some chinese exported ammunition.

So what was the reason that the Grom-1 temporary removed from the Su-34?

To OP

anything interesting in todays update?

apparently the bombing targets thought it was unfair to them so they cried until it got removed

1 Like

it was not even that OP trust me

Would be pretty game breaking in Sim if Su34’s could just zoom climb after take off, launch at a base on the other side the map, turn around, land, rearm and repeat.

Good luck trying to counter that ticket drain if you’re on the opposing team.

Low risk high reward gameplay from the Su-34’s POV.

2 Likes

More than likely was removed for the time being because the game couldn’t fully render the damage at that range. I had moments where it said base hit but the base didn’t take any damage.