the chu mpm they literally have no reason and the model already technially exists in the type 93
1 Like
ask Grom.
Hes a dev and usually provides a more clear answer.
i dont know that one
gromvoiny , hes a nice guy.
Dont dm him to much though… since its not his job to answer questions here.
1 Like
F.4.1 is already in service across all three Airframes and has nothing to do with whats shown here, instead it shows possible for future development, most notably F.5, which we already know will expand the weapon arsenal by a good extend.
1 Like
Dm he only once
I just really don’t want Switzerland to be a German sub-tree and a TT Swiss vehicle (especially one that needed) will be the point of no return. Rather an Argentinian F-16
2 Likes
No one does, but it happend
oh hey, they completely changed the Su-24’s radar. with a lovely 1 degree air to ground scan zone. apparently happened 5 days ago but i never realized
Sad to see this drop down get taken out in the new stat cards :/ @Smin1080p_WT is there a chance this will stay in? and this is just not on the Dev yet?
1 Like
If anything is missing any payloads, it would be best to submit a suggestion report to ensure its known to the devs just in case.
1 Like
A few parts are still being worked on, however some aspects may not be present in the new system due to how it works.
Not within the current major update for sure, but its a nice suggestion for the future. Would be worth submitting a proposal in the suggestions section perhaps with some medal ideas.
4 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Will the developers still investigate the armor protection of the Dutch and Finnish Leo 2? They still have incorrect protection values (On the Dev server - 450, but it should be - 305)
I wounder if any changes are still being made to the PESA radars,
Also I heard there was datamined for a big change to all flankers flight models, anyone know if this has been implemented yet on the dev?
I mean it depends on how you define nothing.
In terms of air and ground, Thailand doesn’t have much in the way of domestic designs. However, they do have a lot of very unique imported designs that would bring different gameplay styles into the Japanese tech tree. In terms of air, this mostly translates into high-tier strike aircraft (which Japan has a shortage of because the F-1 series are not counted as strike fighters and lack some features from their contemporaries) and for ground, the Thai ground forces have IFVs with actual missiles and, as previously mentioned, the Stingray light tank, both of which are vehicle types Japan doesn’t really have access to at this point.
One of the most interesting possibilities is actually Naval, as the Thai navy in WW2 actually had some indigenous unique designs that could even further bolster Japan’s killer naval lineups.
If that’s “nothing” to you, I guess our definitions are different.
Now, to be clear, I think there actually are indigenous Japanese options that would fill at least some of these roles decently well, and those would be good too. But if Gaijin is going to take the path of subtrees instead, Thailand would bring a decent amount to Japan. I would compare it to Finland for Sweden in a lot of ways.
2 Likes
That’s what I was thinking of mb
Double box for sidam mistral
Spoiler
I was flying the Flanker, I can’t tell if they changed anything if they did so???