I have no idea why the CHU hasnt been added yet.
Probably because its not Russian.
1 Like
The pronunciation of Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese is the same, with only accents being different, and even Simplified Chinese has more accents
1 Like
me either lol
1 Like
It would be fun little speedster that can be killed by mgs so not really op
This^
It would be just fine and a great booster for their lineup.
That’s probably why we havent gotten it yet…
1 Like
hahah yeah lets give japan the ifv we just gave them the squadron verison with a telescopic mast lol
1 Like
Would be researchable vehicle rank 8 after JH-7A, and BR 13.3
Gaijin not ready 2 variants 4 years and very advanced
Personally, I guess might be Rafale M F1
I never saw TAV-8B mounted weapons
F/A-18C basic or F/A-18C MLU 1
Domestic israel guided munitions
Dont get me wrong I dont hate the ifv being added to the line up but there is nothing you get that isnt there already with the squadron ctwv thing
Thailand is going to be such a let down…
I think the sub-TT will be next year and fully C&P
Thailand will add nothing at best to whatever tree its going to let us be honest it is was a meaningful as giving taiwan to china.
I heard it might have a unique american stringray light tank but yeah lol
I’ve heard that they get nothing new.
F-84F, A4E etc…
I suppose the benefit is not having to GE the squadron vehicle or wait a couple of months to get it.
Yeah but its not addressing anything serious gaps in japan. It is nice it just meh okay is any japanese main serious going to take this in their line up over a type 90 or type 16 or typpe 10s
As a serious Japan main - there are so many issues in the Japanese TT that could very easily be resolved.
But the only answer we are getting is: “It’s pretty difficult to model vehicles from which not a lot of sources are available” or “everything will come when ready” or “wait for the news”.
Meanwhile… adding F117, 2S38, Izmael, etc…
But the most produced WWII Strike aircraft, bombers and fighters for Japan… - with lots and lots of sources, from blueprints to pictures - that’s not enough…
3 Likes
the chu mpm they literally have no reason and the model already technially exists in the type 93
1 Like
ask Grom.
Hes a dev and usually provides a more clear answer.
i dont know that one
gromvoiny , hes a nice guy.
Dont dm him to much though… since its not his job to answer questions here.
1 Like
F.4.1 is already in service across all three Airframes and has nothing to do with whats shown here, instead it shows possible for future development, most notably F.5, which we already know will expand the weapon arsenal by a good extend.
1 Like