Only one side of this has any real substance to their claims tho
I will reiterate;
How many? :D Name it.
Oh, and that too. Except MiG-29G. That’s very good. That’s THE only first-gen MiG-29 what work properly.
And again transfer the Gripen to the category of aircraft without long-range combat? IRIS-T is not ASRAAM, it is a relatively small missile with a short range (it is a missile still “stuck” in a five-inch caliber and very aggressive aerodynamics with high drag). Even with the implementation of LOAL, its limit in the game will be ~10km.
Why go so far as to distort things if it has 120C installed? Okay, 120C is too early. But the Hungarian one should also have 120C (as well as the Swedish one), but from the balance calculations the snail gave 120A. LOGICAL. What’s stopping you from doing the same with the South African one? R-Darter is a Cheetah’s missile.
not like the russian one works the exact same or the hungarian one, but no lets ignore that
Does the Soviet or Hungarian have R-73? Wait a minute, I’ll check. Well, well. Oh. Right. THEY’RE NOT THERE. They have trash sticks, which someone for some reason called missiles. “R-60M”.
the mig 29g isnt exactly a first generation one either it has been changed to nato standards
germany has a mig 29 without r73 like everyone else
and russia has one with r-73 as well the mig29smt
mig29g and smt are both not first gen anymore
mig 29smt works as it is supposed to and does so fine
NATO standards are meaningless when it only improved communication and IFF. MiG-29G is still a 1st gen Fulcrum
is there any update regarding the 2 Viggen DIs and its considered addition of 9M/RB74(M)
IFF; GPS, Cockpit
The MiG-29G is extremely very much so a first generation MiG-29…
Doesnt improve its capabilities. Also afaik it wasnt upgraded with GPS
didnt say that ;D
In WT 29g it’s pure 1st gen with classic missile set (73+27). Not with redused set (60+73). And 29g it’s still have light airframe unlike 29smt. That what i mean
so the 29smt still works perfecetly there is no issue
welp.
RWR changes
orig in russian*
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CxmPKADUHiw8?comment=0gRhSrqoOhyZQAZhGFsHOJgY
English is not my first language, so I’ll clarify. And since you don’t understand the hints, I’ll explain as bluntly as possible. By “works properly” I meant “is loaded properly”. The 29 has 3 states in the game
Cut down. (29 USSR, Hungary and Germany)
True. (29G)
Overweight. (29SMT)
The original message was that the only thing that stands out in the German tree at rank 6+ is the 29G, because it is the only (at the moment) correct classic MiG-29 9-12/13. Everything else is usually just copies of what is in other TTs
IDK bro, you’re saying “X leak is fake” for the last 3 updates and yet the leaks came out mostly true
yet u can’t accept you were wrong and continues meatriding the snail and start to grab the only straw you have left - the hornet
On top it’s not some random leak on a discord server with 3 members which is obviously fake
It’s either gzsabbi or the Chinese leaker who’s correct for 1,5yrs now.
So make up your mind and stop coping
Jesus
The RB75T in-game uses a seeker that’s the same as the AGM-65B/K, so not the same as the RB75 (which is the same as the AGM-65A). Seems like in the game files it uses the same model as the AGM-65K, interesting because like the 65H it uses a CCD seeker, except this one (the 75T and K) gets a 2.5° fov seeker whilst the H gets a 5° fov seeker but both get the same tracking ranges ( ~6km against a tank sized target) regardless.
The list stated it was to be delayed
Meanwhile, the list had a 90+% accuracy rate, just like all previous lists from the same source… and the 10% remaining accuracy is for vehicles that are delayed to the following updates, so it’s actually 100% at the end of the day.