The Sea Harrier has had numerous corrections since it’s release and other reports are under investigation. It is not abandoned.
2 Likes
All Harriers still have an extremely sooty exhaust and the SHars all still have placeholder HUDs. If the HUDs cant be fixed soon, should replace them with the F3s HUD. At least give us the symbology we are meant to have
and thats not even mentioning issues like the Heat Sigs or BOL
7 Likes
Sooty exhaust, incredibly easy to lock even from the vertical, dodgy hud, missing ordnance at least on gr7, can’t flare most threats without 90% of your flares, dodgy chaff, placeholder maws…
Placeholder MAWS for the Gr7 too
Well. I hope at least that one means something then.
Thanks
( I prayge, i prayge)
Honestly I feel like if I keep updating this list, I’ll be here until New Years.
yeah
This took way longer to write than it should have
1 Like
And this is just one harrier, yea?
Well… Focusing on the 3 SHars with a few overlap issues with others, but essentially yes.
1 Like
Yeah if it took an age to cover a series with overlap, I’m going to give up updating that list. I want to get sleep this eve.
Yep, but have no fear. The Sea Harriers have an updated RWR panel in the cockpit, just need VR for it to be usable normally, but it has it.
1 Like
Yeah, VR’s still buggered on Linux. Don’t know why, we know how to get it working, we just get hit by anticheat if we do.
@Smin1080p_WT a lighter question, have the devs considered bumping the 9.7 first gen harriers down 0.3 in GRB to 9.3? I do really like the Harriers, but neither the US or the UK trees have a TT ground vehicle at 9.7 (Only the Rooikat 105 for the UK, and the XM8 for the US, both of which are unavailable for console, and not much easier to get on PC), and the incoming AV-8S only has the Type-16 to pair with.
Would also have the side effect of insulating against the 10.7 black hole of premiums and decompressed MBTs which can be a bit of a pain in a 9.3 tank. One might discribe it as not fun.
Also weaponry wise it’s all dumb, unlike similar subsonic platforms at 9.3 (Bucc S.2, A-4E etc)
3 Likes
That would be a good change. Even just the GR1 with no CMs would be huge
“Statistics dictate that the Gr1 needs to remain at 9.7”
I would not be surprised if the AV-8A and AV-8C moved to 9.3 but the GR1/GR3 remained
1 Like
I would be willing to bet on it lol
Legacy Hornet is in no way comparable to Su-30. Maybe if you dropped Super Hornets but even that would be transonic at best. F/A-18C and MiG-29K is a much better and fair comparison
1 Like
29K after Sea Harrier FA.2 take it or leave it
I vote leave it and add a Sea Harrier FA2 late instead with ASRAAMs
1 Like