Major Update "Firebirds" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

I have been waiting for years for an Iberian tree, with Spain, Portugal and Ibero-America (Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela, Mexico, Peru, etc).

I don’t understand why it’s so hard for gajin to make trees to keep their customers happy when most of them are copy&paste.

Obviously I would 100% support an ASEAN tree.

1 Like

this is kind of different from the others. It’s still USSR tree, and it logical to put the 2 main Soviet republics together if not the war.
Gaijin did good job here, avoid everything about it so far

Hence why I said modern Ukraine, not old Ukraine, because I know it would have made sense if it wasn’t for the war.

what?? i never heard my country have military exercise with china, atleast not in the last 10 year, while we often(atleast once a year) exercise together with japan (together with us, singapore), from that alone indonesia have more military connection to japan than china

and not to mention most of our main vehicle came from us, germany, or france, all NATO country

20 Likes

and the UK! (cvrts & Hawks!)

1 Like

I think modern Ukraine too, if not these politic things in recent 10 years, they are still much more connected than other examples. I think it not even a sub considering that they are both successors of USSR and it’s a USSR tree.
but before everything ends

hawk tua

Not allies
They are just “friendly”

confused

13 Likes

Devstream is tomorrow.

If not - read first sentence. 😆

repeat

This really is the ideal solution.

China still has considerably more domestic options from both PRC and ROC respectively, as well as many other subtree options like Pakistan, Bangladesh and North Korea alongside very China friendly ASEAN countries like Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia. Singapore and Indonesia are not just unreasonable in the Chinese tree, they are also unnecessary.

6 Likes

The same source also confused stuff from WTMobile with the main game, or did rumors that never came true.

Just wait and see instead of trying to create more credibility around it than it’s worth.

China probably doesn’t need a subtree yet, there are plenty of things they can implement with their own weapons.

You are going off topic.

Such huge commotions usually bring out one of the CMs (most commonly poor Smin) with guns blazing, giving a pretty firm denial to kill the tide of the arguments. And yet, this time the only thing that happened is that Smin denied any SL reductions being exactly 50% (conveniently sidestepping the follow-up question of what about reductions in general), and the only reaction to the Singapore problem has been a ton of mutes and bans. Not a single reassuring peep to calm us down.

That very well may be, but it also depends on how far you’re willing to go back in history. If you base it on WW2, yes, it can be rude. If you base it on modern-ish day relations, it’s rude if they add Singapore to China. Just look at what Singaporeans, like @AquaUselessGod said for their opinions. :)

30 Likes

Yes. Japan is the one that REALLY needs those. Honestly I don’t think China would really need additional subtrees from ASEAN countries either.

2 Likes

Yeah apparently even some people who weren’t rude or went off topic or political got muted and timed out here, says a lot about some of the staff in particular, and it just seems like damage control

5 Likes

11 Likes

Nothing compared to the damage that would come if the leaks are true and the snail doesn’t change course

13 Likes