But we are want more vehicles not for set-up.
1 Like
I certainly hope so. I certainly hope my conspiracy theory is wrong despite my pessimism since the placement of the J-10A.
Say what you will about sub branches implemented so far, they at least haven’t come at the expense of their host trees.
1 Like
I’m sorry if this isn’t the right place to ask, but what about the Chinese M8? From what I understand, it lacks any differences with the event M8 in the US TT, aside from the livery. Is that just a one off, or am I mistaken?
Hahaha thanks buddy
1 Like
Worst part about the Leo 2 copy-pasting for me, is that Germany after all these 2A4s still hasn’t gotten an 8th batch 2A4 with C-Tech armour.
6 Likes
So.
When people says
“SA restricts the introduction of British stuff”
you says no this does not affect , more vehicles will come.
But now you says that “already exist type of vehicle restrict introduction of same vehicle type”???
1 Like
Now its been moved up they could just add it as an upgrade to existing 2A4 like they do with the BV version for the T-80s etc
Im not sure what you mean here
A) No South Africa does not prevent domestic British things from coming (as apparent by the last few updates)
B) Spesifically this was about Class 3(P). One vehicle that we don’t have plans to bring to the British tree at the moment. We don’t rule out other South African vehicles being possible.
3 Likes
As I said, we aim to avoid it where possible or use different variants of it where it can be done. But for China’s lower tiers (particularly Rank I), there is not a huge amount of options. So this is indeed more an exception than the norm.
2 Likes
expand SA/IND line when
1 Like
As time passes, i’m getting more certain “subnations” were a mistake
12 Likes
Yes and we still didnt recieved best Merkava 3 model aka 3D in Isreal tech tree.
Gaijin decided to add Ram Se’gol aka modified Merkava 3D as premium vehicle but still refuses to add similiar model to regular tree.
Can we expect to see this vehicle in regular tree in the future?
1 Like
India under Britain is the #1 mistake
I disagree, the South African tech tree is the standard of what a subtree SHOULD be, comprised entirely of indigenous designs, and even a very copy paste subtree has their places, such as Japan. The problem is, Gaijin has just been using them to buff nations, which is not why people like sub trees.
I only disagree in the sense that the Viljante does make sense in the BR tt.
The T-80 should have gone to Russia though.
2 Likes
They are the definition of “Good idea in theory, bad in practice”.
And unless it is completely redone from the start and done differently, it will never be good.
All of them are bad even South African.
Gaijin : now we want to add ASEAN for China
Su-35 basic (Su-27M) Air-to-Air armament like MiG-29S (9.12S & 9.13S), MiG-29SMT (9.17) and Su-27SM. my guess
As I mentioned above, we spesifically picked different versions to that the US event ones didn’t collide with others available for research in the Israeli tree. So we don’t plan to add the same Merkava 3D that’s in the US tree.
1 Like
wacky that china is getting leopard 2s before the uk, which is just insane since there are no nations aligned with china that use the leopard 2, I wonder why out of every nation china could get they got a sub tree of a nation that absolutely hates them
It would use essentially the same armament as the SU-27SM