Yeah I agree. I’m not “hyped” for the F-117. I’m cautiously looking forward to it.
But I’m not hating on it either, roasting it before we can see how it’s modeled, before it’s announced even. Give it a chance.
1 Like
I’m still happy that it’s added for the people that like it.
And if Italy is really getting the OSA, I always welcome more subsonic targets to shoot down.
it is already going to be a tumor in Air Battles due to the fact it can’t do anything to contribute to a win.
In Ground battles it will work just not be anything exceptional, as it has the payload of a 10.3 strike jet
In Sim is where it’ll likely get the most value.
it’s not unreasonable to judge this plane before release.
KV-7(U-13) perfect fit.
And how do you fit “1946” into “_-__”?
3 Likes
idk
2 Likes
i wanna know whos “dream” tank that is, it looks boring to me.
first
second , the event one is garanted to be KV-7 U-13 , was already leacked by the past and is a perfect fit
Fair. Any sane person will not bring this thing into ARB. Sadly there’s too few of those.
Fair, but we don’t know it’s BR yet. It could be anything.
Yeah 100%. It will be a unique experience, that’s for sure.
Overall I imagine it will be alright, it will have serious flaws but still fit into it’s own niche.
I agree it’s OK to judge planes but the roasting it gets here is unfair and uncalled for when we don’t know how Gaijn will model it and what BR it is.
1 Like
I wonder what the designer was thinking
Even then, it can still be spotted and caught by any supersonic aircraft.
and IS-7 1946 doesn’t fit because it would be IS-7 1-46
That the ugliest, Most useless modification i have even seen on a tank, like what do you do with 2 25mm gonna do in 3.7? ingonring the new weak spots and more weight making it slower
2 Likes
considering its a KV-1 hull with the add on plate I doubt it will be 3.7, also blame the soviets lol
Dreams come true?? This is more like a Nigtmare
1 Like
Today Teaser Mc Freezer
The real error here is making it a squadron vehicle, I don’t know what they are thinking.
1 Like
Umm yes, but spotting a black dot against the background of the ground or sky or in the clouds is much more difficult than homing in on a radar track
Of course it can be spotted visually, it’s not literally invisible xD
But you say this like it’s an easy 100% reliable thing to do
I mean, even with a true leak there can be misunderstandings and mix ups, as well as more changes from Gaijin based on feedback.
We have no idea what caused the change or even how serious of an idea it was. And considering the strong feedback the leak got I’d say it’s not unlikely Gaijin would revert it back and just pretend nothing happened.
We do know the leak changed from being in the next update, to being considered in the future, which does play into the whole Gaijin reacting thing.