Doesn’t matter how far it got. They never used it in service, nor would it fill some extremely desperate hole in the TT. Britain, under no circumstances, should get the F-117. US already suffers enough from their vehicles being copy pasted into different trees. There is no reason to make that worse.
I still believe that’s the case, since Japan still need things anyway, but if there are other alternatives that are “less destructive” then the options are there for it. China doesn’t need Singapore and on a gameplay perspective they wouldn’t benefit nearly as much as just having their own stuff be better.
And my narratives has mostly still not been political, it is still factual that Singapore has no links with China militarily, while Japan and South Korea might not, they share similar strategies when it comes to defending against their neighbours and also uses similar equipment.
1 Like
how do they suffer from something that takes literally absolutely nothing from them?
Now, I think I can say we’re at least on the same side if not in 100% agreement for this Singaporean sub branch situation, and I can appreciate that the US took the leading role in WWII as a whole, but war against Japan was an existential war to the ROC and inflicted long-term change upon balance of power in China for a variety of reasons, and an argument can be made that it means more to China (I do NOT mean contemporary politics) than it does to the US.
'Just shedding some more light on a very-minor issue I wish to take.
Any top tier AA, especially the Pantsir would like to disagree with you
It could make a unique event vehicle for Britain way into the future, but its overall a downgrade over the Jaguar Gr1A, so probably not even worth it outside of the fun of it and maybe adding a guided weapon carrier at a slightly lower BR, though I doubt it would be anywhere below maybe 9.7-10.0, if even that low in GRB.
But there are too many event vehicles id rather see added and considering our last 2 were bombers (Buc S1 and Jag IS) Id rather see a fighter added. If we are looking at paper vehicles then Id take this:
BAE P.1216
1 Like
yesterdays devblog was uploaded at 14:40 UTC. Aka 29 mins
we already had one today, so I’m asking if there has been another one
y’all have been really worked up here that’s why im asking
if its gonna be like yesterday, as said before - 28 mins
Gaijin trying to make money for Japan
12 Likes
Agreed, Germany urgently need new top tier arh slinger. F4F ICE albeit has the weaponry but it’s still lacking in maneuverability and acceleration department. The new arh meta greatly demand those two sectors to be fulfilled which F4 ICE lacking. Swiss f-18 is a good addition as a stop gap while waiting for the arrival of Ef typhoon. Still better than nothing
2 Likes
it’s not like yesterday
Blog release times don’t follow patterns
Lol China got PLZ-05 before Russia getting Msta
…
Brace yourselves for China is the new Bias
the russian one gonna be a better one for sure Pantsir and Tor-M1
1 Like
Also China should’ve got PLZ-45 before PLZ-05 … Gaijin speedrunning again to latest modern equipment
I’d rather have the tor for Soviet tech tree than the pantsir NGL.
1 Like
Yeah it still confuses me why they didn’t just add the TOR at the same time they give China one. But nah they surely needed the Pantsir to say competitive…
2 Likes
i just want a variety of cool looking ships seeing the same turet layouts are getting slightly old
“F-117-1 OCIP” Comes across as oddly specific on the leaklist. Anyone know what that can mean?