How that’s way too late
Yep and now I’m working on my hypbrid Wellsworth route I’m building and focusing on
I remember in October update, the dev season usually only last 1 week until the teaser
I’m just gonna say that I really wish we’d get Yugoslavia… I know on some of the leak lists there was a Polish/Eastern Europe tree leaked which had Slovenia, Croatia, and Serbia on it, but I really would rather see them and the rest of the post-Yugo states as part of a separate standalone Yugoslavian tech tree. That has to be my number 1 desire for the future of the game, with LatAm coming close second.
4 Likes
Yeah, according to the spreadsheet it’s been 2-3 devblogs till teaser for the last 3 October updates.
So I think we get 2 today and the teaser as well.
A mods in Chinese Tieba(Chinese Reddit, not official, no official staff) say that this leak and the SG/ASEAN sub is fake, not sure how he gets this source, but I think he knows some of Gaijin’s operational staff.
6 Likes
We’ll just have to wait and see, there is likely co-relating info soon.
Maybe it getting leaked and the backlash hit gajin so much that they changed their plans again, and now they are doing damage control
15 Likes
Hope that is the case
Praying for it
1 Like
Can you specify “that” for those of us unable to read the context well?
1 Like
In the picture he said:
I keep an open attitude to the addition of leo2 to the Chinese technology tree , but he does not like it.
I has same attitude not only to the leaked leo
2A4, but the leo2SG(which may added to the game in the future).
If you want to play these vehicles play other nations.I prefer if the CN tree stays “pure”, even if not strong.
However, I don’t disagree on the addition, since most of the players may not research more than one tech tree.Although a big mixed Chinese tech tree might be a good thing for players who dont research other nations,
I don’t like these vehicles I won’t play it, that’s it.
1 Like
TL:
I am open to the introduction of a Leo 2, but I don’t like the attitude (of Gaijin)
Not just A4, but the probability of 2SG “attitude”.
If you want to play these vehicles play other nations.
I prefer if the CN tree stays “pure”, even if not strong.
However, I don’t disagree on the addition, besides majority of the playerbase may not play more than one nation.
CN tree becomes a big mixed nation might be a good thing for players who dont play other nations.
I don’t like these vehicles I won’t play it, that’s it.
5 Likes
Thank u for translation🙏
1 Like
I can tolerate the decision IF Indonesia’s guaranteed to Japan as a sub tree.
Verbal advertisement protected by advertisement law, or Indonesian equipment is added to Japan this major/at the same time as Singaporean equipment.
2 Likes
i hope this is the case as well
1 Like
Personally as a Singaporean (and I speak for most as well) we don’t tolerate it ever. That’s the equivalent of putting modern day Ukraine to Russia to us, or South Korea to Japan, or Middle East countries to Israel. As much as Gaijin hates to admit it, it is a geopolitical reasoning.
20 Likes
They have more equipment than just “t-80” as you call it. Nevertheless I don’t see the problem with adding T-84 Oplot and BTR-4, as they sure couldn’t be added to Russia without inducing a huge PR nightmare.
There’s some stuff in there I really want to see, like the Stingray List of equipment of the Royal Thai Army - Wikipedia
4 Likes