So a better Sprut crossed with a BMP-2M. Wow I can’t wait…
What a great point to justify a whole other tech tree in game…
As for the other “bad” points I already addressed the other guy.
In all honesty, I feel like India should be added to Israel’s tree for a few reasons.
-
Israel, while not lacking potential additions, is already struggling to receive content due to the sheer quantity of tech trees in the game—a total of 10, each with an aircraft and helicopter tree. Some even come with two naval trees. Adding another independent tech tree would make this significantly worse.
-
Israel and India are military partners and have a history of working together on issues. India was also one of the first states to recognize Israel’s sovereignty on September 17, 1950. During the Indo-Pakistani wars of 1971 and 1999, Israel played a key role in helping India by supplying Armaments, Ammunition, and intelligence.
-
India is currently being placed within Britain, and I believe that if India is to be fully added, it should not be a sub-tree for Britain. Britain and India do not share ties like Israel and India. Britain is also not hurting for additions and has plenty of potential with its current subtrees. Take Jordan and South Africa, for example.
If India is to be added into the game, it would be the most realistic to implement their tech within Israel’s tree. This is the healthiest option for the game, in my opinion.
1 Like
i dont know where the fuck did you find a BMP in zorawar
3 Likes
literally as per your points, all vehicles are copy pastes and hence no nations should exist because a vehicle in some way or another is similar to other
you are not forced to grind a tech tree anyways, we see a point and potential in this if not you
4 Likes
honestly i agree with this, india and israel had made kinda a lot of weapon systems together, there should be a india - israel combined tt tbh
2 Likes
Congratulations on cherry picking what you want to hear and getting everything wrong as usual.
I meant that players should be forcing gaijin to allocate resources to more game modes, decompression and fixing maps instead of blindly asking for slop with posts like this. The only point you’re making is that you’d rather have another lazy copy pasted tech tree with a flag you like instead of meaningful changes.
Did you already forget what you typed?
Maybe as a sub tree, not a new tech tree.
A sub tree of which nation? Because Britain is not a good choice at all
All you did was repeat disproven points and use the same strategy. Re read Aspandal’s comment
3 Likes
If that’s what you believe then you’ve done the same thing as noister. Re read my comments but this time do it with some objectivity in mind and focus on my conclusions
all your points just say some vehicle in tech tree will play slightly similar to other, hence it should not come, with this in mind, boxer mgs shouldnt come because its a wolfpack knockoff. ozelot shouldnt have come because it uses non german missiles (stinger). puma vjtf shouldnt have come because bmp2 plays similar, hence no nation should exist because all of them are copy paste of each other. all of your points say the same slop with no head or toe.
5 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
so your point is that gaijin should make new gamemodes for the game.
cant argue with this and i respect this opinion, top tier arb is fucking scuffed with invisible stuff and god knows what the actual fuck happens in the match, same for grb with cas molesting ground battles with bad maps.
but again if we see, i am pretty sure gaijin outsources work for 3d modelling of vehicles(might be wrong on this, but still there are a different group of people who make 3d models), so apparently these vehicles barely put any load for those developers working on different mechanics. the problem is the stigma in gaijins mind that adding new gamemode or tweaking matchmaking will make the game go into shambles. we forced gaijin so much to reduce top tier player count but at the end all we got a goddamn “option” which gives a “chance”(like 5%) to get a smaller match size.
gaijin should focus on this, but still these developments go parallel, and tbh for stuff like these there are different categories. there are genuinely some tech trees like turkey, poland and india itself which should get fair representation in game.
1 Like
You can’t deny that players have a role in sending the wrong message to gaijin that mindless content needs to be prioritized over QoL improvements regardless of how resource allocation is done. Posts like these are part of the problem. Parallel development of game modes and new vehicles will never happen since players aren’t asking for the former in large enough numbers. As long as that’s the case we’re going to be served the same decade old, rancid slop with only the plates and tablecloths changing color. Why do you and so many care so much about representation which is essentially slapping a new flag on a bunch of the same old same old when the core game stays the same?
We tried to lower arb match size earlier, after so long they just gave us a option with a fucking small chance to get a smaller match, unless we do a review bomb they ain’t gonna do shit. Atleast we can get but unique vehicles if we beg for anyways.
Let’s switch the topic because this is going off topic
2 Likes
Early prototype of Arjun
9 Likes
Early NAG carriers prototype trials.
Thats the another 360° sights for BMP-2
(I have already counted three of them)
4 Likes
When will we get a sub tree?
Guys, i am Kunal Biswas been playing war thunder for sometime …
Btw, happy to see some of my tweets get posted here …
Happy to help …
I think I have seen some of your tweets before
1 Like