You already know what the “new nation” is anyways
1 Like
Tie a knot land hehehe
URSS/Russia: Press X to doubt it.
It was one of the things i was most excited for on the orginal roadmap, then it didnt come.
I was hoping it would come in this update, but it wont, and hopefully it wont be delayed further.
I dont necessarily mind 3 per day, but Id have issue with it being the first 3 per day. If it was a booster I could choose to activate or choose to apply after the match then it would be good. My concern is that if its only the first 3 matches per day, then its gunna suck, because not only am I usually the worse for the 3 matches of the day, but RNG plays a big part of doing well in GRB.
In ASB, god knows how it will work and its in that regard im most interested, as Im never grinding another ground nation, but may grind another air nation.
1 Like
I said one of not the :P
Can’t wait for Pakistani Sub tree xxaxxaxa
1 Like
Probably backend issues along with balance math.
You seem to be confusing matters. I was referring to countermeasure systems. There is not a “nation bias” there.
The ASSTA has been corrected to Mk 103s. It no longer has Mk 105s.
Regarding the GR.1s Mk 101s, this was explained at the time why.
We are continuing to work on more light vehicles for Britain. They cannot however all come at once. Whilst some members of the CVR(T) family were indeed integral, their use in game is not as significant as others. The Fox itself was also a highly requested light vehicle and just as integral too.
Its not what is tolerable to the developers, but what is misleading to others. To claim all of these matters are bugs or are reports, is wrong. It detracts from the matters that have actually been reported and drowns out every positive step that is taken towards improvement as every positive change is visibly seen less. Leading to further inaccurate assumptions that “nothing is being done”.
2 Likes
Do you know what else is like this?
The Ajax :P
2 Likes
As before, we would update the reports themselves or mention them within the changelog if there was a status update or news to report on that front. There is currently a lot of ongoing work with the major update as well as in the background, investigations into many other spall liner reports outside of just Chinese MBTs too for multiple nations.
2 Likes
Appreciate the response, I guess I’ll just have to keep checking in on the report here and there
1 Like
@Smin1080p One last thing
Please for the love of god change this
it’s setting off my OCD I hate the colour change in that
3 Likes
That previous one looks better
2 Likes
Welcome back Smin1080p.
The point is though. Before I created that thread. basic issues like the turning problems were not fixed. Even though that bug report had been submitted nearly 18 months before. I think it was finally acknowledged when I DMed it over to a tech mod. Then it got fixed 6 months later.
As a direct result of that thread and the efforts of that bug list. As well as a reduced bug list that flame submitted on the dev forums last update. We have gotten a dev post (which addressed 4 bug reports) and this remodel which may or may not have fixed one of the biggest issues of the Chally 2. We are still awaiting its final form and there are a number of bug reports regarding this change and changes proposed in the original dev post (like the aluminium backplate) that have yet to be addressed.
But yes, the devs have FINALLY begun looking at the Chally 2 and what the tank is like now compared to what it was like 7 months ago when I originally created that thread is unrecognisable and after 7000+ comments on the main thread and even more on other threads. Even more issues have been identified, researched and reported.
Do I expect every single bug report to be fixed? of course not.
Do I expect that it will make the CR2 a “meta” tank? Of course not.
But Even if some of those issues, on that list are fixed, then it will be a radical improvement for the CR2 and by extension the British ground TT, which unlike most nations, is almost 100% dependent on the performance of a single line of tanks at top tier. If one has a weakness they all share that weakness.
So its a step in the right direction. I appreciate the fact that Gaijin is finally doing something. But I think its fair to say, I dont think we’d have had the progress we’ve had, if it wasnt for that bug list and the effort of many many people putting in a LOT of time and effort on that thread and we still have a very, very long way to go
2 Likes
J-8 Peacepearl ? I guess it would be early premium pre-order pack aircraft to rank 8 for china in the future
I’m not surprised Chengdu J-10A better Shenyang J-8F and good early domestic chinese multirole fighter aircraft
Guizhou FTC-2000G BVR combat better Shenyang J-8F ?
1 Like
Yes, absolutely. Buyer can even choose a AESA radar for it. But most of the FTC2000s are sold without AESA radar. They use KLJ-7 Pulse doppler radar.
I find it funny that a roblox game models the armour of the challenger 2 better then WT does lol
4 Likes