No, I mean this:
Can you stop behaving like a kid that thinks his stuff is always superior?
8 Likes
The Gr.7 camo (even though it’s incorrect), I saw ZD464 crash.
i wouldn’t say that as it not in production they can still change it to have more range
1 Like
ohh, ok
I saw somewhere that Su57 has slightly less RCS than Rafale but its way higher than J-20’s RCS.
no not 100
1 Like
You know its not reddit. So please try to be more sensible and mature.
4 Likes
SU57 is no way near F22 or F35, literally the crack from its airframe make it so it has immense RCS comparing to better things like F22 F35, and that is simply because they cant machine the airframe correctly
I didnt compare it to F22. Read my sentence again.
You’re telling us about things that don’t even eixst lol? aim260 been already used and production, first missiles are mounted this year on aircraft are you crazy?
lol
lmao even
1 Like
i don’t think so
1 Like
you are replying to the wrong guy
no but you’re saying that SU57 has better RCS than rafale, and rafale is very good but still has a big RCS comparing to F22, ur trying to make it like SU57 is a crazy jet. It’s not, wake up!
wrong guy again
Are you stupid or something. I said it has slightly less RCS than a Rafale but no where near the levels of F-22. It has higher RCS than the chinese J20.
they both use thermal imaging with IRCCM, therfore being more or less the same
as for datalink, it’s just a way to send data from one device to an other, be it a ship a plane, a missile, or whatever can roll, float, or fly.
Regarding Python 5, the 26 km range is in line with most missiles (IRIS-T, AIM9X) , but definitely lower than mica IR by a good margin. and yes it’s a FOX 2, since it still uses IR as terminal guidance. Datalink does not matter for missile launching designation, only the seeker in the missile does.
2 Likes
but it doesnt have less RCS than rafale that for 1 and for 2 you tried to make it like su57 is good
We have the SU57 in game already
6 Likes