I will have to be honest with you, I do not see a single match in Italian vehicles, the only minor nation being Britain.
Minor nations are different from US, Germany and Russia, and a lot of these vehicles are either DOA or immideately lose to its competitors in the same country.
I am talking about Strv 122Bs.
If you found me counfusing I will try to speak in more simple and direct terms, sorry for the confusion. I tried to discuss academic shit because I felt it is useful to explain how a chunk of the playerbase thinks.
It is with tremendous repentence that i prostrate myself before your acculterated intellect.
1 Like
My apologies. I am getting a bit overhead with that.
1 Like
It will be interesting to see what Gaijin does with top tier balance. NATO tanks are still going to go through a period where the biggest threats were IED’s and RPG’s. Hence why the TUSK II has a mine plate that does nothing but add weight to the vehicle, and ERA that is really only good against chemical threats.
Unpopular opinion, but the NATO/Western tanks gave only minor consideration to peer and near-peer armored threats for a while, so coupled with Classification issues that every nation has, it will be difficult to give NATO tanks survivability that isn’t a “back of the napkin” attempt at roughly approximating their protection. On the flipside of the coin, most of Russia’s tanks do NOT have autoloaders that facilitate longer rod penetrators, and as design has shown, the length of the penetrator is the best determining factor for penetration. Single stage NATO ammo can do this, not Russian 2 stage. The T-14 will make it a little better with a stronger breach, and a slightly different autoloader that will pick up a little bit of length for the rod. But Russia will top out due to design limitations, just like the West albeit for different reasons.
1 Like
i could be wrong but didnt the t90m get a faster autoloader? just thought of that
And I play China as well, which is probably just a little better off than Italy, but not by much, and many BR’s are challenging to play. But they aren’t DOA, you just have to massively modify the way you want to play the game sometimes.
It is still 7.1 in Mod.2017, as of the one in the game.
Wdym? China is in a great state rank V on.
Italian vehicles require a very dedicated doctrine, but this plane in 11.0 will have very questionable capabilities even with a full loadout. It is practically a Su-25BM that is not very slow, and we know how unpopular the BM is.
It has a loadout comparable to Super Etendards, Jaguars and TRAMs, each with their ups and downs. I don’t see why a reduced arsenal at 10.3 won’t work.
It is not bad in lower tiers as well, just the amount of copypastes makes it unpopular. China in lower tier is unpopular because it is mostly copypastes, they are good, but offers not a lot of new experience. Its 3.7, 5.0 and 7.3 are all half decent. With the introduction of more indigneous vehicles at lower BR it should make it even better.
Also the fact that you get punished if you complain about them too much.
2 Likes
Yeah, the Sepv2 and A7V are prime examples (ignore the Challenger and leclerc and Arietes which are rotting away)
4 Likes
Challenger 2 with ERA in game that couldn’t stop a RPG
2 Likes
Looks like the devs rejected it for using a Russian source.
1 Like
F-16A Block 10 didn’t have Sparrow capability, the Sparrow capability on the F-16AJ ingame is based on the Sales brochure for the F-16AJ.
1 Like
My Phantom FGR seeing Su-27s, F-15s and JAS-39s alongside the 29s and 16s next patch
15 Likes
Just in case, but which report are you talking about?
The one I have open in front of me has been aknowledged and hasn’t bene denied.
EDIT: nvm you are right.
Honestly why could they give both Sweden and us the Gripen C would of saved then a bunch of time.
Sagittario 2 would like a word