Incredible
Why cant we each all have our own personal China?
if we are going off of introduction date then the uk should get the ASRAAM as it entered service in 1998 only 4 years after the python 4, which wont happen so we wont have to worry
i know am just making reference to the fact that the AAM-3 and the Python-4 are contemporaneus both missiles are early 4 gen missiles, the ASRAAM is more a 4.5 to 5 gen
They missed an easy layup with a box of rip-it’s/wild tigers. It’s not too late gaijin ;)
funnily enough people are complaing about how the uk doesnt have a good domestic sam we could get the supacat HMT with ASRAAMs
3 Likes
ohhhh that shxt looks cool! haha funny truck boiii
yeah and since its ground launched they should be a bit more balanced
2 Likes
Not a box of Rip-It’s or Wild Tiger’s on Click-Bait yet… but it belongs there. If you know, you know.
3 Likes
My only issue is that the Python-4 is Thrust Vectoring no?
1 Like
No, it doesnt have TVC.
Actually Missiles from the Pythons series and Derby series doesnt have TVC, Rafael’s filosophy is to not use TVC technology because it’s a waste of energy and speed in Air to Air missiles.
nah, its not a leak, it can been found on website
1 Like
Really? I thought the 4 and 5 had TVC
Nope they don’t have TVC You can go to Rafael website and search info about it too if You want to check, but am actually a fan of israelí missiles haha am not gonna tell You something that is not correct.
1 Like
Yeah I guess I always just assumed they were for some reason thats interesting, I guess the Python 4’d be fine then but 50gs is a little scary
Yea i know it sound scary but the thing is if You are going to die for a missile i doesnt matter if it’s pulls 30, 35, 40, 45 or 50Gs if the missile is well launched You are going to die anyways, the thing with this modern missile that we have in game is more the IRCCM than the Pull, Yea i know the Pulls helps a lot in a dogfight but the question is, the pull of the missile helps without IRCCM?, those two things complements each other but actually the most importante factor here is the IRCCM.
We have the example here with the AAM-3 THIS thing here Made a 180 degree turn like nothing for example if the enemy see the missile coming doing a 180 direct to his Six but if the AAM-3 doesnt have IRCCM and its going to be flared ‘easy’ the Pull of the missile to do a 180 degree is in vain because the missile would be flared easily. My point here why You would prefer to use a missile with more pull without IRCCM over a missile with a little less pull but with IRCCM knowing that if You launch it correctly the missile will probably shoot down the enemy more easily than a harder Pull missile without IRCCM.
1 Like
Thats also a good point
1 Like
This thing is like the opposite of the R-73, it’s so sad because I remember the R-73 doing cool stuff like that shot, but instead we have yet another missile that for balance purposes, pretends that it loves flares.
1 Like