Well there’s video footage of an ALARM missile blowing up a 9K33 during testing. Not to mention the Tornado tactics manual explicitly states ALARM should be used against mobile SAM systems.
So that should be evidence that SPAA can be engaged by ARMs.
thats why you check from PSO, it has the UFP add on armor as well and theoreticaly should be the same but isnt. comparison with 2a6 as you said isnt possible since it is missing the add on
That is a good change, now We can choose which to deploy first, than spending every CM for some IR/ ARH missile
If I drank water every time someone complained about good German vehicles I’d die of water poisoning.
They could fix other nations unrealistic armor profiles and it would be fine
na just pull a yak 141 and say it would have entered service
it ain’t russia so they can’t pull a Kronstadt/yak 141
Yak-141 was built.
The hate against Kikka & Yak-141 is genuinely stupid.
And @someweirdname implies all vehicles ever made are Russian.
can I hate the Kronstadt?
No, that’s production.
never mounted radar, or a gun, or half the missiles it had, or its IRST so no it isn’t dumb when they add a jet that barely matches what it actually had
In all these years since Strv 122’s introduction, I’ve never seen a Strv 122 being killed by being hit in the glacis armor after the add-on modules were removed, and I have never experienced it myself either…
I don’t even know if it would work or if it’s just a visual thing, since, well, I’ve never had it happen to me, nor have I seen it happening anywhere.
So… I would hardly say that’s a reason to say 2A7V’s armor would be much better than Strv 122’s in practical terms.
yeah the production vehicle that was cancelled while around 10% complete, seems like full production to me
im that case the German Aircraft carrier is also production
Because when 3 tanks stand out in terms of capabilities, the solution is to add more tanks with similar capabilities for the nations that lack them; until no tank stands out anymore, since everyone has similar ones in capabilities.
Basically, this is about giving other nations counterparts with equal capabilities.
Or is the solution to never again add any tank with similar capabilities to those 3 tanks, so that those 3 continue to stand out unopposedly?
they already confirmed for naval all they need is the keel to have been laid down hence why we have a soviet battle criuser and why we will get things like HMS lion and H-38
Neither did Swift Mk7, G56, Narval, VB1002, J7W1, Kikka, Ho-229, Ar-234-C-3, XP-50, etc.
Which you & the other imply are all Russian.
Yak-141 didn’t start precedent, the other listed vehicles did; So you are hating on those as well.
And of course people complaining about Kronshtadt when USA & Germany have equivalent battlecruisers.
so 3 Yamato class battleships?
gimme in game
now the AR-234 is the most bs out of all of them
the thing we have in game is a Mix of 3 different Prototypes