I agree and the reduced forward mobility will mean that the other tanks will always be in advantageous positions before the T-90M.
Yes. Why wouldn’t they?
F1B and F1B+ are only minor changes to the OFL F1 that don’t affect the round’s performance in game. We really need either OFL F2 or Shard.
Great…so it will be even bigger pain to deal with
5 Likes
but it isnt the same, the 3bm59 is shorter than the 3bm60
Looks like the gun mantlet and area around it will be protected
Penetration of 3BM59 should actually be close to M829A1, so while nice it wouldn’t be huge.
Its obr.2017 cause it lacks ERA on the back to be obr.2023
i dont know any characteristics of ofle f2 but shard mk1 seems like it will be too much
OFL f2 is a side grade sadly
OFL F2 did’nt bring more power, but the OFLE F2 yes.
Anyway not the topic.
“bUt lEoPaRd 2a7v oP!”
1 Like
DM73 levels of pen is fine (3-8% increase over current DM53).
My guess would be because they arent US or USSR
Yeah… BVM already giving me trouble.
Then it would be an F-16A bl 10 equivalent.
Dear God… the ingame model looks even cooler than I could have imagined… it’s even got the netting on the turret… this update is amazing for Top Tier fans like myself!!!
Well, mostly no. Ingame it will be almost the same as BVM, but with more protected turret. Still killable through idle wheel, still killable into CoM. Same weakspots as always
Not true. OFLE F2 is also just the new designation of the OFL F2. But this isn’t the place to discuss it i guess
Alwis wil tell you are not hitting its turret)